Sample Answer for NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Included After Question
For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.
This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.
When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation
Title: NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation
The success of healthcare organizations in the modern world depend largely on the effectiveness of their change initiatives. Often, organizations implement change initiatives with the aim of improving their systems and processes. Change also enables them to respond effectively to unforeseen events in their markets. Healthcare providers play a crucial role in facilitating the successful implementation of change for outcomes such as safety, quality, and efficiency. Nurses embrace interdisciplinary collaboration for optimum change outcomes in their practice. The collaboration helps them to learn from others’ perspectives and adapt to different approaches to undertaking assigned roles. Evidence-based strategies should be utilized in implementing change for optimum outcomes (Ellis, 2022) . Therefore, this presentation focuses on an interdisciplinary plan to address the rising rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the medical and surgical floors in my practice site.
The selected organizational issue is catheter-associated urinary tract infections. An interview performed with a nurse manager of a medical ward revealed that the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections have been rising over the last quarter in both the medical and surgical floors. The recent statistics showed that the rate was higher than the benchmark data for the hospital. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are part of hospital acquired infections that threaten the safety, quality, and efficiency of patient care. Therefore, unlike other problems identified from the interview, catheter-associated urinary tract infections have the potentials of causing unintended harms to the patients. In addition, nurses and other healthcare providers should implement interventions to prevent it, since it is associated with hospital interventions, hence, its selection for the project.
Significance of the Organizational Issue
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are significant to the practice site because of several factors. First, catheter-associated urinary tract infections threaten the safety, quality, and efficiency of care that the organization offers to its patients. A further rise in rates is likely to affect the reimbursement the hospital receives since catheter-associated urinary tract infections are safety and quality indicators that influence reimbursement for hospitals. The rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections have also risen, translating into the need for a responsive intervention. The rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections is also high in the USA. Accordingly, statistics shows that they contribute up to 1 million cases annually in the USA. In addition, the costs that the country incurs in treating catheter-associated urinary tract infections ranges between $115 million and $1.82 billion annually.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections also contribute to increased hospital costs and stays for the patients. The increase in costs is attributed to the additional care needed to treat and prevent its associated complications (Letica-Kriegel et al., 2019). The hospital stays arises from the fact that patients may develop complications such as septicemia, which demand complex management. Prolonged hospitalization also decreases patients’ productivity and quality of life. For example, complications such as septicemia may cause additional organ damage, leading a decline in one’s quality of life and increased disease burden (Atkins et al., 2020). Therefore, interventions to prevent, minimize, and prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections are essential.
Evidence-Based Interdisciplinary Plan
The proposed evidence-based interdisciplinary plan entails providing nurses and other healthcare providers training on the translation of evidence-based data into practice. This will be followed by them collaborating to identify an evidence-based practice intervention that can be used to improve catheter-associated urinary tract infections rate in the hospital. The selected intervention will be implemented collaboratively with the aim of identifying success factors and eliminating potential weaknesses that will affect the project. Part of the plan initiatives are the provision of coaching and mentorship and equipping staff with knowledge and skills of selecting and translating evidence into practice. Emphasis will be placed on incorporating best practices into the existing organizational culture (Melnyk & Fineout-Overhold, 2022).
Interdisciplinary Team Members
The interdisciplinary team members will be varied. They will include registered nurses, licensed practice nurses, and unlicensed assistive personnel. This groups of nurses provide direct patient care to patients with indwelling urinary catheters. They also urinary catheters for the hospitalized patients. Therefore, they should be trained and be involved in the implementation of best practices. Physicians will also be involved since they prescribe urinary catheters, treatments, and assess patients for risks of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
Why Interdisciplinary Collaboration Approach
An interdisciplinary collaboration approach is the most preferred for the proposed plan. This is attributed to the benefits that an interdisciplinary collaboration has in the care process. First, interdisciplinary collaboration approach minimizes errors in the provision of patient care. The involvement of different healthcare providers in assessing, planning, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating care eliminates any potential sources or errors in the care process. Interdisciplinary collaboration approach also improves patient and care outcomes. There is an increased focus on the development of care plans that are specific to the patient needs.
As a result, patient-centered care that promotes outcomes such as patient satisfaction and empowerment is offered (Ellis, 2022). Interdisciplinary collaboration also contributes to efficient care coordination. Different healthcare providers participate in making decisions that aim at optimizing the patient and care outcomes. Lastly, interdisciplinary collaboration promotes efficient resource utilization in healthcare. The prevention of adverse events such as errors in the care process eliminates unintended expenditures in treating complications and lawsuits by health organizations. Similarly, patients benefit from reduced hospital stay and costs (Cashion & Pickler, 2018).
Goals of the Plan
The goals of the proposed plan at three-fold. First, the plan aims at reducing and preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections through the use of evidence-based interventions. The second goal is to reduce costs and hospital stays for hospitalized patients due to catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The last goal is to equip staff with competencies needed in translating evidence-based data into practice.
Implementing the Interdisciplinary Plan
As noted initially, the implementation of the plan will be collaborative. Staff in the medical and surgical floors will work as a team in implementing the agreed strategies to prevent and reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Collaboration will ensure collectivism in the outcomes achieved from the implementation of the plan. The other approach to implementation will be staff training on plan implementation. Training will aim at ensuring that the staff are competent to implement the project and report any outcomes that require attention of the interdisciplinary team. Part of the implementation process will be regular assessment. Regular assessment will be done to identify any issues that should be addressed for enhanced project outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overhold, 2022). Lastly, coaching and mentorship will be offered. This will be important to sustain the outcomes of the plan.
Managing Human and Financial Resources
Some strategies will be adopted to ensure effective and efficient management of human and financial resources. One of them will be developing a budget for the plan. The budget will guide the use of human and financial resources in the project. The other strategy will be ensuring transparency and accountability in all the project activities. In this case, evidence for any resource utilization will be provided to ensure efficiency in the implementation of the plan. The team will also explore evidence-based strategies for human and financial resources management. For example, tools such as Gant chart may be used to track project processes and resource utilization to avoid any forms of wastages. The last strategy to ensure effective and efficient human and financial resources management will be eliminating any duplication or roles or activities. Duplication will lead to unintended ineffective use of resources in the implementation of the plan (Hewett et al., 2018).
Project Evaluation Plan
The project evaluation plan will focus on outcome, process, and structural measures. Outcome measures will evaluate if the project objectives were achieved or not. This will focus on aspects such as changes in catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates, healthcare costs, and hospital stays for hospitalized patients. Process measures will also be used in the project. Process measures will assess the effectiveness of the approaches that were adopted in assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. It will focus on aspects such as the perception of the staff on the effectiveness of training, their involvement in the project, resource utilization, and communication approaches utilized by the team. The last measure will be structural measures (Sandbank et al., 2021). This will focus on any changes in the organization due to the project. It will examine issues such as changes in the organization’s policy, procedures, standards, and regulations that pertain to safety, quality, and efficiency of patient care.
Disseminating Evaluation Results
Disseminating evaluation results is important for the staff that were involved in the project and other healthcare providers. One of the strategies for disseminating evaluation results will be through a boardroom meeting with the staff. This will be used to communicate the project process, results, and recommendations. The other approach will be presenting results in conferences. Conferences will be used to reach to a wider population and increase awareness about the adopted strategy to prevent and minimize catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The last strategy will be publishing an article about the project for future reference by other scholars, policymakers, and healthcare providers (Estabrooks et al., 2018).
Atkins, L., Sallis, A., Chadborn, T., Shaw, K., Schneider, A., Hopkins, S., Bunten, A., Michie, S., & Lorencatto, F. (2020). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions. Implementation Science, 15(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2
Cashion, A., & Pickler, R. H. (2018). What Will I Bring: Nurse Scientists’ Contributions to Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Nursing Research, 67(5), 347–348. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000299
Ellis, P. (2022). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing. SAGE.
Estabrooks, P. A., Brownson, R. C., & Pronk, N. P. (2018). Dissemination and Implementation Science for Public Health Professionals: An Overview and Call to Action. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, E162. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180525
Hewett, R., Shantz, A., Mundy, J., & Alfes, K. (2018). Attribution theories in Human Resource Management research: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 87–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1380062
Letica-Kriegel, A. S., Salmasian, H., Vawdrey, D. K., Youngerman, B. E., Green, R. A., Furuya, E. Y., Calfee, D. P., & Perotte, R. (2019). Identifying the risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A large cross-sectional study of six hospitals. BMJ Open, 9(2), e022137. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022137
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overhold, E. (2022). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Sandbank, M., Chow, J., Bottema-Beutel, K., & Woynaroski, T. (2021). Evaluating evidence-based practice in light of the boundedness and proximity of outcomes: Capturing the scope of change. Autism Research, 14(8), 1536–1542.