NUR 705 Assignment 6.1: Quantitative Article Critique #1—Part I

NUR 705 Assignment 6.1: Quantitative Article Critique #1—Part I

Value: 5 points

Introduction

This week, you will locate a quantitative research article and submit the article as the preliminary step for your second article review. Your critique of the article will be due in Week 9.

Assignment Guidelines

1. Search the library for a research article that is related to your DNP project or area of interest.
2. Select one research article that that is a quantitative study you will use for your article critique.
3. Submit the link or a PDF copy of your article and your justification for the selected article. Your justification should include:
   1. A summary of how the article relates to your potential DNP project topic or area of interest.
   2. The search terms you used in your search.
   3. The filters that you established for your search, such as year limits.
   4. The process you used to review the search results.

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 6.1: Quantitative Article Critique #1—Part I page.

Week 6: Quantitative Research Designs—Part 2

Lesson 1: Quantitative Research Designs—Part 2

Introduction

Last week, you reviewed some preliminary information on quantitative research designs and timeframes for conducting them. Understanding comparison groups and timeframes for measurement helps us understand which statistical test needs to be conducted.

This week, you will look at how designing research can improve the quality, rigor, and validity of the findings. Good research is designed to minimize extraneous variables that can affect outcomes.

In order to evaluate high-quality evidence, it is important to understand research designs and how a study’s design is important to answering the research question.

Remember the levels of evidence presented briefly in Week 2? This week, you will learn more details about sampling, comparisons, variables, timeframes, and statistical analysis. All  of these concepts come together to provide the entire research study picture.

---

Learning Outcomes

At the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

• Understand the factors that contribute to rigor and validity in quantitative research.
• Discuss how nursing research can be designed to provide supportive evidence.
• Understand how research study design factors into levels of evidence.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 705 Assignment 6.1: Quantitative Article Critique #1—Part I

Before attempting to complete your learning activities for this week, review the following learning materials:

---

Learning Materials

Read the following in your Polit & Beck (2021) Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice textbook:

• Chapter 9, “Quantitative Research Design”
• Chapter 10, “Rigor and Validity in Quantitative Research”

APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.