NUR 705 Assignment 11.1: Quantitative Article Critique #2—Part II

NUR 705 Assignment 11.1: Quantitative Article Critique #2—Part II

Value: 20 points

Introduction

In this paper, you will critique the article you choose in Week 10. Although the questions below are closed-ended, provide narrative answers about your evaluation/analysis of that particular aspect of the article.

Assignment Guidelines

Your paper should include the following components:

• Provide a short summary of the article (one to two paragraphs).
• Answers to the following analysis questions:
  1. Is the title descriptive of the content of the article? Does it contain key words that help a person quickly identify the area with which the study is concerned?
  2. Does the introduction provide a general explanation of the purposes and significance of the study?
  3. Is there evidence that the authors are knowledgeable about the field? Has a summary of related studies been included in the introductory material?
  4. Are the hypothesis or research questions clearly and explicitly stated?
  5. Are the dependent and independent variables identified? Are they operationally defined? Are any extraneous variables identified as well as measures for controlling them?
  6. Is the population clearly defined? Are the sampling procedures that give rise to the samples being used clearly described? Are these procedures appropriate and defendable?
  7. Are the data-gathering instruments identified, described, and/or explained? Has reliability and validity evidence been presented?
  8. Are the experimental or statistical design and procedures clearly presented?
  9. Are the data clearly described? Did the researchers provide a description of how they were analyzed? Did the researchers draw conclusions based on the data?
  10. Have any unexpected or unusual results been identified?
  11. Is the style of writing and presentation scholarly (spelling, grammar, organization of the article)?
• State your overall evaluation of the quality of the research presented in this article. Based on your evaluation of items 1–11, would you say this is good research or not? Explain your evaluation.

Your complete critique should be no more than five pages and follow APA guidelines.

Turnitin

Your assignment will be scanned using Turnitin software. Turnitin is an online service that highlights matching text in written work. It indexes Internet sources, databases of subscription services, and written work submitted through its website. Assignments sent through Turnitin are scanned against all of its sources, and a report is generated that summarizes and highlights matching text and where it was found. It is up to instructors and students to interpret the report to determine if plagiarism occurred.

You may submit your assignment to Turnitin before its due date to assess your work against Turnitin’s database. You may use the Originality Report’s results to address any originality concerns in your work, and then resubmit your assignment for grading. You may only submit and resubmit until the assignment’s due date. Any work that has been submitted at the time the assignment is due will be considered your final submission, and this will be the submission used for grading.

For additional information, visit Turnitin and GradeMark: Students..

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 11.1: Quantitative Article Critique #2—Part II page.

Week 11: Modeling Relationships

Lesson 1: Modeling Relationships

Introduction

Last week, you looked at relationships between variables measured at the interval level, called correlation. In health care, we often want to know if we can “predict” an outcome based on an intervention. This week, we will look at the predictive probability of an outcome occurring. However, we need to ensure that we have a correlation between variables measured on the interval level before we can use modeling relationships, called linear “regression”.

We can also use a regression technique using nominal and categorical variables. We term this logistic regression. Both linear regression and logistic regression fall under the category of statistical testing known as multivariate statistics.

---

Learning Outcomes

At the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

• Understand principles of linear regression.
• Explain the concepts of simple linear regression.
• Explain the concepts of logistic regression.
• Understand how predictions apply in nursing practice.
• Apply statistical knowledge to evaluating published research.

Before attempting to complete your learning activities for this week, review the following learning materials:

---

Learning Materials

Read the following in your Polit & Beck (2021) Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice textbook:

Chapter 19, “Multivariate Statistics” pp. 412–421 (stop at Analysis of Covariance) and pp. 425–427 (start at Logistic Regression on page 425)

Read the following in your Kim, Mallory, & Vallerio (2022) Statistics for evidence-based practice in nursing textbook:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 705 Assignment 11.1: Quantitative Article Critique #2—Part II 

Chapter 10, “Modeling Relationships”

APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.