NUR 703 Assignment 7.2: Mini-Grant Project: Part Three

Value: 50 points

Introduction

Although there is variation among proposal formats, these are the sections that are commonly found in federal grant applications. Many agencies have specific requirements for length of proposals, either page number or word count limits. For this Mini-Grant Project, (Links to an external site.)the page limitations are noted with each section. It is very important for your writing to be clear, succinct, and comprehensive.

Assignment Guidelines

Includes Parts One, Two, and Three
Level of funding requested budget worksheet. Provide details of what the amount requested will be used for and if the amount requested does not cover the total project expenses, please list other funding sources. (1-2 pages).
Method of evaluation: An evaluation plan that makes explicit how the impact of the project on the participants will be tested. The evaluation should be tied directly to your objectives. (1-2 pages)
Sustainability plan: A plan for continuing the program after the funding period (1-2 pages)
Conclusion (final persuasive argument; one paragraph)

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 7.2: Mini-Grant Project: Part Three page.

Week 7: Mental Health and Substance Use

This week you will understand how mental health and substance abuse are interconnected, which will help you to identify vulnerable and at-risk individuals. Prevention of mental health and substance abuse disorders and promotion of interventions to build healthy communities through policies and programs are key components to optimize public health.

You will be developing a Public Service Announcement poster to promote education of mental health or substance abuse. Keep it simple with a powerful message. Also, the third part of your mini-grant project is due at the end of the week, so be sure to review the provided presentation to better understand the details of what is required. I look forward to reading your final proposals.

Lesson 1: Mental Health and Substance Use

Introduction

Mental health and substance abuse are interconnected, therefore, identifying vulnerable and at-risk individuals and populations through screening tools and implementation of effective health promotion strategies can help optimize public health.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Apply the Institute of Medicine (IOM) (now named the Health and Medicine Division (HDM) Prevention Framework to mental health and substance abuse disorders among vulnerable populations.
Use epidemiological data to assess the burden of mental health and substance abuse disorders on the h health of the population.
Examine cultural and stigma considerations involved in population-level interventions involving mental health disorders and substance abuse.
Determine the budgetary and other resources needs for a community-based health promotion program.
Develop a comprehensive evaluation and sustainability plan for a community-based health promotion program.

Before attempting to complete your learning activities for this week, review the following learning materials:

Learning Materials

Read the following in your Public / Community Health and Nursing Practice: Caring for Populations textbook:

Chapter 10, “Mental Health” (pp. 239–252)
Chapter 11, “Substance Use and the Health of Communities” (pp. 256–277)

Optional Resources:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). Substance Use and Mental Disorders: Early Detection, Prevention and Treatment (PDF) (Links to an external site.).
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2020). National Institute on Drug Abuse (Links to an external site.)
National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2020). National Alliance on Mental Illness (Links to an external site.).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (Links to an external site.)

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 703 Assignment 7.2: Mini-Grant Project: Part Three

These materials and resources will increase your knowledge of the burden of mental health and substance abuse on the health of the population and the stigma associated with these disorders. Additionally, these materials describe the prevention efforts and programs available at the individual, family, and community levels.

Mini Grant Part III Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Budget	10 to >9 pts Exceeds Expectations Resources needed for program comprehensively identified and budget included. 9 to >6 pts Meets Expectations Resources needed for program identified and budget included. 6 to >3 pts Nearly Meets Expectations Resources needed for program identified, but budget incomplete. 3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Resources needed not identified and budget not included.	10 / 10 pts
Evaluation	15 to >14 pts Exceeds Expectations Evaluation plan clearly identified, organized, and comprehensively discussed and linked to program objectives 14 to >12 pts Meets Expectations Evaluation plan adequately identified, organized, and/or discussed and linked to program objectives 12 to >8 pts Nearly Meets Expectations Evaluation plan inadequately identified, organized, and/or discussed and/or does not link to program objectives. 8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Evaluation plan not stated or unclear and/or poorly described.	15 / 15 pts
Sustainability	10 to >9 pts Exceeds Expectations Sustainability plan clearly stated and comprehensively described 9 to >6 pts Meets Expectations Sustainability plan stated and adequately described 6 to >3 pts Nearly Meets Expectations Sustainability plan stated, but inadequately described 3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Sustainability plan not stated or unclear and poorly stated.	9 / 10 pts
Conclusion	5 to >4 pts Exceeds Expectations The conclusion provides a perfect final persuasive statement wrapping up all provided evidence and content presented in the paper. 4 to >3 pts Meets Expectations The conclusion provides a final persuasive statement wrapping up with evidence and content presented in the paper. 3 to >1 pts Nearly Meets Expectations The conclusion provides a final persuasive statement wrapping up the thesis (or point) of the paper, but lacks the integration of evidence and details provided throughout the paper. 1 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The conclusion is not included and/or does little to wrap up the thesis (or point) of the paper.	5 / 5 pts
APA Formatting and Professionalism	10 to >9 pts Exceeds Expectations No APA formatting and unprofessional elements are present. 9 to >6 pts Meets Expectations APA formatting and/or unprofessional elements are present. 6 to >3 pts Nearly Meets Expectations APA formatting and/or unprofessional elements are present. 3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Egregious and/or excessive APA formatting and/or unprofessional elements are present.	10 / 10 pts
Total Points: 49

Mini-Grant Project Part Three.pdf

APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.

NUR 703 Assignment 7.2: Mini-Grant Project: Part Three