NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper

NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper

Assignment Guidelines

Identify a concept (usually one or two words) you are interested in. Ideally, this concept will be the focus of your DNP Project. Utilize specific scholarly sources, including books or peer-reviewed articles from scholarly journals. You can use a reference book such as an encyclopedia, thesaurus, or dictionary, but limit yourself to only one of each.

Write a brief paper (three to four pages) in APA (7th edition) format addressing the following items:

  • Alternative definitions—these must be referenced
  • Defining attributes
  • Antecedents
  • Consequences
  • Model, borderline, and contrary cases
  • Empirical referents

These items should be the headings for your paper but should be no more than a paragraph or two each. The paper should include a title page and reference page (not included in total paper length) and use of appropriate scholarly sources cited throughout.

You will submit the assignment via Turnitin; a Turnitin score less than 20% is expected. Turnitin is an online service that highlights matching text in written work. It indexes Internet sources, databases of subscription services, and written work submitted through its website. Assignments sent through Turnitin are scanned against all of its sources, and a report is generated that summarizes and highlights matching text and where it was found. It is up to instructors and students to interpret the report to determine if plagiarism occurred.

You may submit your assignment to Turnitin prior to its due date once to assess your work against Turnitin’s database. You may use the Originality Report’s results to address any originality concerns in your work, and then resubmit your assignment for grading. You may only resubmit once until the assignment’s due date. Any work that has been submitted at the time the assignment is due will be considered your final submission, and this will be the submission used for grading.

For additional information, visit Plagiarism Detection: Students.Links to an external site.

The assignment will be evaluated using the Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper Rubric found in your syllabus.

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper page.

Week 3: Concept Analysis

This week you will identify a potential phenomenon of interest for your DNP Project. To help define the phenomenon of interest and distinguish between similar concepts, you will perform a concept analysis. This is a creative process to help you clearly define the problem and determine critical attributes of a phenomenon.

Review a list of all items due this week in your course syllabus.


Lesson 1: Concept Analysis

It is never too early to start brainstorming potential topics or phenomena of interest for your DNP Project. Ask yourself, “Is there something about the practice setting that needs further inquiry?” Consider your own areas of interest and passion as well as the needs of the organization and patient population. A concept analysis is a valuable exercise to more clearly define the problem and critical attributes of the phenomenon of interest.


Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

  • Identify the primary concepts of a phenomenon of interest.
  • Perform a concept analysis to determine the key attributes of the concept or phenomenon of interest.

Before attempting to complete your learning activities for this week, review the following learning materials:


Learning Materials

Read the following articles and resources:

Examples of Concept Analysis articles:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper

NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper
NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper
Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
Alternative definitions
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Thoroughly defines the concept and provides appropriate citations for the definitions.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Provides some definitions of the concept and sources for the definitions.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Defines the concept but definitions not appropriately cited.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Concept not appropriately defined and/or cited.

10 / 10 pts
Defining Attributes
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Defining attributes are identified and thoroughly explained.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Defining attributes are identified but explanation may not be thorough.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Some defining attributes are identified and may be explained.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Defining attributes are missing or not clearly explained.

10 / 10 pts
Antecedents
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Antecedents are thoroughly explained.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Antecedents are provided but explanations may not be thorough.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Some antecedents are provided and may be explained.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Antecedents may be missing or not clearly explained.

9 / 10 pts
Consequences
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Consequences are thoroughly explained.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Consequences are provided but explanations may not be thorough.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Some consequences are provided and may be explained.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Consequences may be missing or not clearly explained.

8 / 10 pts
Model, borderline, and contrary cases
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Describes each case thoroughly with clear, concise examples.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Describes each case somewhat clearly with examples of each.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Describes each case with some details and /or examples of each.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Describes cases but either unclear or lacking examples.

10 / 10 pts
Empirical referents
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Clearly and concisely describes empirical referents in a manner that explains the presence of the concept.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Describes empirical referents in a manner that explains the presence of the concept.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Attempts to describe empirical referents in order to explain the presence of the concept.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not describe empirical referents well.

9 / 10 pts
APA and Writing Scholarship
0 pts
(0% deduction) Fully Meets Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) are correct. Professional written communication and correct grammar are used.

0 pts
(05% deduction) Nearly Meets Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) have some errors. Some errors in written communication and grammar.

0 pts
(08% deduction) Barely Meets Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) have frequent errors. Frequent errors in written communication and grammar.

0 pts
(10% deduction) Does Not Meet Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) have numerous and distracting errors. Written communication and grammar lack professionalism.

0 / 0 pts
Total Points: 56

APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.