NUR 700 Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplars

Assignment Guidelines

After completing the assigned readings, answer one question from category one and one question from category two. Be specific, give specific examples, and cite at least one source in each answer.

Your paper should be two to three pages long (not including the title page or reference page) and use correct APA 7th edition formatting.

Category One

Exemplar 1: Analyze the JBSM practice exemplar (Chapter 7, p. 102). Discuss one strength and one challenge of this model for nursing applications.

Exemplar 2: Compare the Orem practice (Chapter 8, p. 130) to aspects of your own clinical practice. Which of the three steps of Orem’s process of nursing is most challenging?

Exemplar 3: Select one of Roy’s four adaptive modes and share how it has been displayed in the practice exemplar (Chapter 10, p. 160).

Category Two

Exemplar 4: Describe how Parse’s concept of true presence (Chapter 15) could apply to your practice.

Exemplar 5: Explain how the nurse practitioner in the HEC exemplar (Chapter 16, p. 287) fostered the process of expanding consciousness.

This assignment will be graded using the Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplars Rubric found in your syllabus.

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplars page.

Week 2: Integrative and Transformative Paradigms

This week, we’ll discuss selected nursing theories and conceptual models that may be categorized as integrative or transformative. A common characteristic of the integrative category is seen in the theorists’ views of the individual as a system that is interacting and being influenced by environmental challenges. A common characteristic of the transformative category is seen in the theorists’ views of the individual and environment that reflect a mutual response to challenges that is continually changing and evolving.

Review a list of all items due this week in your course syllabus.

Lesson 1: Integrative and Transformative Paradigms

There are three theories that we will examine as exemplars of the integrative paradigm. These theories are: Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, and Roy’s Adaptation Model.

The transformative paradigm builds upon an understanding that the relationship between the individual and the environment continually exists as the lowest common denominator for interactions. Consequently, responses to change and evolving activities occur mutually between both the individual and the environment. There are two theories that we shall examine as examples of the transformative paradigm. These theories are: Parse’s Humanbecoming Paradigm and Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Describe the major concepts associated with selected models and theories.
Discuss how the selected models and theories serve to guide practice in the discipline of nursing.
Discuss the nursing practice implications of Parse’s Humanbecoming paradigm.
Explain the influence of the Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness on nursing clinical care behaviors.

Before attempting to complete your learning activities for this week, review the following learning materials:

Learning Materials

Read the following in your Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice textbook:

Chapter 7, “Dorothy Johnson’s Behavioral System Model and its Application”
Chapter 8, “Dorothy Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory”
Chapter 10, “Sister Callista Roy’s Adaptation Model”
Chapter 15, “Rosemarie Rizzo Parse’s Humanbecoming Paradigm”
Chapter 16, “Margaret Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness”

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 700 Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplars

The assigned reading directly relates to the achievement of lesson outcomes.

Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplar Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Content	20 to >17 pts Fully Meets Expectations The response for the selected exemplar has focus and the model or theory’s significance is fully explained. An additional source or sources are used, and the source integration shows sophistication and critical analysis of the material while contributing to a discussion that exhibits a thorough understanding of the model or theory. 17 to >15 pts Generally Meets Expectations The response for the selected exemplar is reasonably focused, and elements of the exemplar are somewhat convincing but could have greater impact. An additional source or sources are used and exhibits elements of correct understanding of the model or theory. 15 to >13 pts Barely Meets Expectations The response for the selected exemplar is somewhat focused, elements of the exemplar are addressed but analysis is not convincing. An additional resource is used but is superficially integrated into the response and suggests a shallow understanding of the model or theory. 13 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The response for selected exemplar is unfocused or confusing. Elements of the exemplar not addressed or are too briefly addressed to be meaningful. Any analysis and application of the required additional source suggests misunderstanding of the model or theory or additional source is not used in the response.	20 / 20 pts
Documentation and Mechanics	0 pts (0% deduction) Fully Meets Expectations Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is thorough; sources are current, professional, and recognized authorities in the field; and paper adheres to APA style. Writing is fluid and free of errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting. 0 pts (02% deduction) Generally Meets Expectations Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is adequate, most sources are of adequate academic quality, and paper adheres to APA style. Writing is reasonably fluid, with few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, or formatting. 0 pts (05% deduction) Barely Meets Expectations Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is sometimes inadequate, some sources are of low academic quality, or paper does not adhere to APA style. Writing is somewhat disorganized, with notable errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting. 0 pts (10% deduction) Does Not Meet Expectations Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is absent, notably deficient, or inconsistent; sources are of poor academic quality; or paper does not adhere to APA style. Writing is disorganized with many errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting.	0 / 0 pts
Total Points: 20

APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.

NUR 700 Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplars