NUR-674 Project Timeline Graphic Organizer

NUR-674 Project Timeline Graphic Organizer

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a graphic timeline for the development of your project. At a minimum, be sure to include the deadline or timeframe for your:

  • Project approval
  • Education development
  • Stakeholder education
  • Implementation date
  • Assessment of initial outcomes/implementation
  • Reassessment of outcomes

Include the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in each implementation step. Be sure to provide sufficient detail. Please keep in mind some of the dates may be after your practicum has ended.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR-674 Project Timeline Graphic Organizer

NUR-674 Project Timeline Graphic Organizer
NUR-674 Project Timeline Graphic Organizer

Rubric Criteria

Total 45 points

Criterion1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient3. Approaching4. Acceptable 5. Target
Deadline or Timeframe for Education Development

Deadline or Timeframe for Education Development

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for education development is not included.

5.4 points

The deadline or timeframe for education development is incomplete or incorrect. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

5.94 points

NA

6.21 points

NA

6.75 points

The deadline or timeframe for education development and the roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are included.

Deadline or Timeframe for Reassessment of Outcomes

Deadline or Timeframe for Reassessment of Outcomes

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for reassessment of outcomes is not included.

5.4 points

The deadline or timeframe for reassessment of outcomes is incomplete or incorrect. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

5.94 points

NA

6.21 points

NA

6.75 points

The deadline or timeframe for the reassessment of outcomes and the roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are included.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1.98 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2.07 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

2.25 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Deadline or Timeframe for Project Approval

Deadline or Timeframe for Project Approval

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval is not included.

5.4 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

5.94 points

NA

6.21 points

NA

6.75 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval and the roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are included.

Deadline or Timeframe for Assessment of Initial Outcomes/Implementation

Deadline or Timeframe for Assessment of Initial Outcomes/Implementation

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for assessment of initial outcomes/implementation is not included.

5.4 points

The deadline or timeframe for assessment of initial outcomes/implementation is incomplete or incorrect. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

5.94 points

NA

6.21 points

NA

6.75 points

The deadline or timeframe for the assessment of initial outcomes/implementation and the roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are included.

Deadline or Timeframe for Stakeholder Education

Deadline or Timeframe for Stakeholder Education

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education is not included.

5.4 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education is incomplete or incorrect. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

5.94 points

NA

6.21 points

NA

6.75 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education and the roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are included.

Deadline or Timeframe for Implementation Date

Deadline or Timeframe for Implementation Date

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date is not included.

5.4 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date is incomplete or incorrect. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

5.94 points

NA

6.21 points

NA

6.75 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date and the roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are included.

Layout of Graphic Organizer

Layout of Graphic Organizer

0 points

Layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with small point size for fonts and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of formatting is evident.

1.8 points

Layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting, with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1.98 points

Layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, color, or busy background detracts from or does not enhance readability.

2.07 points

Layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read, and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

2.25 points

Layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

 

 

 

 

APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.