NUR 590 Assignment Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
NUR 590 Assignment Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
NUR 590 Assignment Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
Description:
Advanced registered nurses work in highly collaborative environments and must collaborate with interdisciplinary teams in order to provide excellent patient care. Besides knowing the role and scope of one’s own practice , it is essential to understand the role and scope of other nurse specialties to ensure effective collaboration among nurses, the organization, and other professionals with whom advanced registered nurses regularly interact .
Use the “Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template” to differentiate how advanced registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate
with different areas of nursing practice. Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader ; family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner ; graduate nurse with an emphasis /specialty in public health, health care administration , business, or informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.
Make sure to compare the following areas of practice in your graphic organizer:
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Assignment Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
I. Ethics
2. Education
3. Leadership
4. Public Health
5. Health Care Adminisu-ation
6. Infonna tics
7. Busi ness/F inance
8. Specialty (e.g., Family, Acute Care)
Include any regulatmy bodies or ce1tification agencies that provide guidance or parameters on how these roles incorporate concepts into practice.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, so lid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA fo1matting guide lines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide , located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Assignment Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
Week 1 Announcement
Hi everyone,
This week we are going to dive right into NUR-513. This first week, we discuss the history of advanced registered nursing (ARN) scope and how it has evolved in its scope and expectations. We will also be researching what the National Academy of Medicine (previously called the Institute of Medicine) recommends for nursing education and how the ARN can impact the health system. You will be completing two discussion questions and responding to your peers’ discussion questions. Finally, your Topic 1 assignment is to complete an online learning environment scavenger hunt. This scavenger hunt can be critical to your success at GCU, so please take the time to read and complete this well.
I look forward to rich discussions with all of you.
Requirements for this week:
1. Topic 1 DQ 1 by 8/6/22 at 11:59 pm
2. Topic 1 DQ 2 by 8/8/22 at 11:59 pm
3. Participation – respond to your peer’s post at least 3 different days this week
4. Assignment – “Navigating the Online Environment Scavenger Hunt”. This is due by 8/10/22 and is worth 50 points.
For full Discussion Question (DQ) points Topics 1-3, you are required to:
- Post your response of at least 150 words.
- Reference at least one source within five years for one of your DQs using APA format.
- When referencing, cite the reference inside your DQ and at the end to support your statements.
For full Participation points, you are required to:
- Post a response to your peers of at least 100 words on 3 different days during the week. Notice this doesn’t just say 3 responses; it must be 3 different days. This is a GCU requirement.
- I mark your response as either “substantial or not substantial” as I read them; watch for those markings throughout the week. If one of your responses was marked as “not substantial,” you will know to add another to receive full participation points that week. However, if you have waited until the last three days to reply to their responses, you will not be able to add another response to receive full participation credit. So I encourage you to respond early in the week and watch for those “substantial” or nonsubstantial” response markings.
As always please reach out if you have questions. However, let’s do this!!!!
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.
Rubric Criteria
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Targeted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is not included. | 9.6 points A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 10.56 points A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present. | 11.04 points A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is clearly provided and well developed. | 12 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to education is not included. | 9.6 points A comparison of roles in relation to education is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 10.56 points A comparison of roles in relation to education is present. | 11.04 points A comparison of roles in relation to education is clearly provided and well developed. | 12 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to education is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is not included. | 9.6 points A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 10.56 points A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present. | 11.04 points A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is clearly provided and well developed. | 12 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to ethics is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is not included. | 4.8 points A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 5.28 points A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present. | 5.52 points A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is clearly provided and well developed. | 6 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to specialty is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Required Sources Required Sources | 0 points Sources are not included. | 4.8 points Number of required sources is only partially met. | 5.28 points Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | 5.52 points Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | 6 points Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. |
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is not included. | 9.6 points A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 10.56 points A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present. | 11.04 points A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is clearly provided and well developed. | 12 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to leadership is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is not included. | 9.6 points A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 10.56 points A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present. | 11.04 points A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is clearly provided and well developed. | 12 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 0 points Sources are not documented. | 4.8 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | 5.28 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | 5.52 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | 6 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
Presentation Presentation | 0 points The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. | 4.8 points The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | 5.28 points The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | 5.52 points The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | 6 points The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | 4.8 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | 5.28 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | 5.52 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | 6 points The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is not included. | 9.6 points A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 10.56 points A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present. | 11.04 points A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is clearly provided and well developed. | 12 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to informatics is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health | 0 points A comparison of roles in relation to public health is not included. | 9.6 points A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | 10.56 points A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present. | 11.04 points A comparison of roles in relation to public health is clearly provided and well developed. | 12 points A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to public health is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
Visual Appeal Visual Appeal | 0 points There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident. | 4.8 points Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited. | 5.28 points Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout. | 5.52 points Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. | 6 points Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. |