NUR-550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Sample Answer for NUR-550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Included After Question

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their design and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.

You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

NUR-550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Review feedback from your instructor on the Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem assignment submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment.

Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Select one qualitative translational research article and one quantitative translational research article for this assignment. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and complete the tables.

Refer to “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview,” located in Class Resources, for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite two peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.Attachments

NUR-550-RS2-TranslationalResearchGraph

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR-550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Title: NUR-550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Nursing Practice Problem:

Nursing practice problems vary in scope, manifestations, and affected populations. Nurse burnout is prevalent in current settings since approximately 34.6% of emergency department nurses encounter or are at risk of it (Kelly et al., 2021). The prevalence varies with settings depending on the workload and interventions for resilience, self-care, and coping. Nurse burnout hampers patient care; it increases stress, job dissatisfaction, and turnover rates (Lee et al., 2021). Nurses experiencing burnout cannot give patients maximum attention hence increasing the risk of misdiagnosis, treatment errors, and patients’ dissatisfaction with care. To avert the dangers of nurse burnout, mindfulness breathing training has been proposed to help nurses cope with burnout and approach patient care with a positive mindset and relaxed mood. As a coping strategy, mindfulness breathing is a meditation practice that improves nurses’ focus by empowering them to be more aware of their thoughts (Veiga et al., 2019; Gherardi-Donato et al., 2023). The awareness helps them to focus on what matters to patients and the care process. The practice promotes a sense of relaxation and relieves stress, which the study population critically needs for sustained performance.

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research

CriteriaPeer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: Slatyer, S., Craigie, M., Rees, C., Davis, S., Dolan, T., & Hegney, D. (2018). Nurse experience of participation in a mindfulness-based self-care and resiliency intervention. Mindfulness9, 610-617. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-017-0802-2   Translational Research Type: T3 (Translation to practice) The study is a clinical trial for enabling the delivery of the recommended and timely care to patients.Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Brun, C., Akinyemi, A., Houtin, L., Mizzi, C., Cardoso, T., & Isnard Bagnis, C. (2023). Mindfulness and compassion training for health professionals: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology13, 8723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1113453 Traditional Qualitative Research Type: qualitative study assessing the impact of a compassion-centered mindfulness program.Observations (Similarities/Differences) Both studies are qualitative in nature and focus on mindfulness. However, the translational research article examines nurses’ experiences while the traditional research article evaluates a broader group of healthcare practitioners.
MethodologyThe study was a mindfulness self-care and resiliency (MSCR) program piloted in Australia’s tertiary acute care hospital. A sample of twenty nurses received the program, and sixteen provided their experiences with the training through semi-structured interviews. The program contained a one-day educational workshop on introduction to mindfulness and weekly sessions of mindfulness skills, including breathing and body movement followed. Nurses also received fatigue resiliency training.Brun et al. (2023) assessed the impacts of the Mindfulness-Based (MB) CARE program among healthcare professionals. The program is a curriculum dedicated to healthcare professionals to reduce burnout levels by training in mindfulness and compassion. Mindfulness training, which included breathing strategies, focused on developing participants’ non-judgmental attitude and good intentional skills, while the compassion component was primarily about enabling participants to accept themselves as human beings.Similarities Both studies are evaluation programs on the impact of mindfulness-based interventions. Differences The study groups, samples, and the length of the programs differ in the articles. The impact areas of mindfulness interventions also differ in the articles.
GoalsThe study aimed at achieving two major goals; reducing compassion fatigue among nurses and enhancing their resilience. These skills enable them to work competently amid workplace stressors increasing the risk of burnout.The study’s primary aim was to evaluate the impact of a compassionate-centered mindfulness program on healthcare practitioners. A critical component of the program was mindfulness breathing, which is the current project’s focus.                Similarities/Differences Both studies evaluated the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on healthcare professionals. However, the translational research article examines the impact of the intervention on reducing compassion fatigue among nurses and enhancing their resilience. In contrast, the traditional research article focused on practitioners’ ability to care for themselves and how the program impacted their practice.
Data CollectionResearchers collected data via individual unstructured interviews. Focus areas included how the program benefitted nurses in developing feelings of inner calm, using self-care strategies, and gaining perspectives and insight.Brun et al. (2023)conducted phone (semi-structured) interviews with healthcare practitioners who benefitted from the program. Focus areas included: the training experience, practitioners’ ability to care for themselves, and how the program impacted their practice.Similarities In both studies, data were collected via interviews; thus, there were one-on-one interactions to explore participants’ experiences. Differences The studied differed in the type of interviews. Slatyer et al. (2018) primarily relied on unstructured interviews while Brun et al. (2023) used semi-structured interviews. Unstructured interviews provide rich details through active listening and probing and participants are less likely to withhold information.

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research

CriteriaPeer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: Gracia Gozalo, R. M., Ferrer Tarrés, J. M., Ayora Ayora, A., Alonso Herrero, M., Amutio Kareaga, A., & Ferrer Roca, R. (2019). Application of a mindfulness program among healthcare professionals in an intensive care unit: Effect on burnout, empathy and self-compassion. Medicina Intensiva43(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2018.02.005 Translational Research Type: translation to practice (T3) The study is designed to enable healthcare professionals to deliver the recommended and timely care to patients.Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Yıldırım, D., & Çiriş Yıldız, C. (2022). The effect of mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy practice on nurses’ stress, work-related strain, and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial. Holistic Nursing Practice36(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000511 Traditional Quantitative Research Type: an experimental study. Researchers conduct such studies to support or refute a hypothesis.Observations (Similarities/Differences) Similarities Both studies are experimental; outcomes are compared before and after the intervention. A comparative analysis of outcomes is used to deduce outcomes. Differences The main difference is that the translational research is a pre-post study using one group while the traditional research article compares findings among two groups.
MethodologyGracia Gozaloet al. (2019)conducted a longitudinal study with an intrasubject pre-post intervention design. Participants included physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants working in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. In this study, researchers conducted a workshop on the practice of mindfulness and its usefulness, followed by 8-week short guided practices via a WhatsApp group. Participants also received daily reminders with stimulating messages.  Yıldırım and Çiriş Yıldız (2022) conducted a randomized controlled trial in a COVID-19 department of a Turkish university hospital. Nurses caring for COVID-19 patients were divided into intervention and control groups of 52 participants each. The intervention group received mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy education.Similarities Both studies use quantitative approaches to test hypotheses. Outcomes before and after the intervention are compared. Differences In the translational research article, researchers train nurses primarily on mindfulness. However, the second study combines mindfulness breathing and music therapy.
GoalsThe study’s primary goal was to evaluate the impact of a mindfulness training program on burnout levels, empathy, self-compassion, and mindfulness of healthcare professionals. Regarding mindfulness breathing, participants were trained on internal anchoring in breathing and attention to breathing.    The study’s primary goal was to investigate how mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy practices impact nurses’ stress, work-related strain, and psychological well-being of nurses caring for COVID-19 patients. It hypothesized that mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy are effective in reducing nurses’ stress levels and raising their well-being levels.Similarities Both studies evaluate the impact of a mindfulness-based program (that includes mindfulness breathing) on healthcare professionals. Differences The study group is broader in the translational research article while the traditional research article focuses on nurses. Besides, the targeted outcomes differ.
Data Collection Gracia Gozaloet al. (2019)administered questionnaires before and after the intervention. The main measurements included burnout levels, empathy, self-compassion, and mindfulness before and after the training program. Other data were demographic and workplace variables.      The researchers used different forms to collect different data and survey participants. The first was a personal information form for demographic details like age, gender, and marital status. The second was State Anxiety Inventory (STI) for identifying anxiety levels. The third tool was the psychological well-being scale for measuring psychological well-being. The last tool was a work-related strain scale for measuring strain levels.            Similarities In both studies, researchers used qualitative data collection tools to compare findings before and after the intervention. Differences The main difference is the use of questionnaires only in the translational research article while researchers use different survey forms in the traditional research article.

References

Brun, C., Akinyemi, A., Houtin, L., Mizzi, C., Cardoso, T., & Isnard Bagnis, C. (2023). Mindfulness and compassion training for health professionals: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology13, 8723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1113453

Gherardi-Donato, E. C. D. S., Díaz-Serrano, K. V., Barbosa, M. R., Fernandes, M. N. D. F., Gonçalves-Ferri, W. A., Camargo Júnior, E. B., & Reisdorfer, E. (2023). The impact of an online mindfulness-based practice program on the mental health of Brazilian nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health20(4), 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043666

Gracia Gozalo, R. M., Ferrer Tarrés, J. M., Ayora Ayora, A., Alonso Herrero, M., Amutio Kareaga, A., & Ferrer Roca, R. (2019). Application of a mindfulness program among healthcare professionals in an intensive care unit: Effect on burnout, empathy and self-compassion. Medicina Intensiva43(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2018.02.005

Kelly, L. A., Gee, P. M., & Butler, R. J. (2021). Impact of nurse burnout on organizational and position turnover. Nursing Outlook69(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.008

Lee, M. M. D., Gensimore, M. M., Maduro, R. S., Morgan, M. K., & Zimbro, K. S. (2021). The impact of burnout on emergency nurses’ intent to leave: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Emergency Nursing47(6), 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2021.07.004

Slatyer, S., Craigie, M., Rees, C., Davis, S., Dolan, T., & Hegney, D. (2018). Nurse experience of participation in a mindfulness-based self-care and resiliency intervention. Mindfulness9, 610-617. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-017-0802-2

Veiga, G., Rodrigues, A. D., Lamy, E., Guiose, M., Pereira, C., & Marmeleira, J. (2019). The effects of a relaxation intervention on nurses’ psychological and physiological stress indicators: a pilot study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice35, 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.03.008

Yıldırım, D., & Çiriş Yıldız, C. (2022). The effect of mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy practice on nurses’ stress, work-related strain, and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial. Holistic Nursing Practice36(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000511

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NUR-550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Title: NUR-550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Introduction

Nurse practitioners need to understand the different types of research designs and their applications in their research studies. The increasing use of translational research implores nurse practitioners to have the capacity to identify their types and designs in comparison to the traditional research methods and types that include qualitative and quantitative. The purpose of this paper is to compare various research designs to enhance understanding and help in the application of evidence-based research into practice to tackle issues and provide better patient care and outcomes.

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research

CriteriaPeer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: Pre-rehabilitation in Alcohol Dependence as a Treatment Model for Sustainable Outcomes. A Narrative Review of Literature on the Risks Associated with Detoxification, From Animal Models to Human Translational Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00339 Translational Research Type: Translational research type 2 (T2)Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Barriers to and Facilitators of Alcohol Use Disorder Pharmacotherapy in Primary Care: A QualitativeStudy in Five VA Clinics https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4202-z Traditional Qualitative Research Type: Interview-bases studyObservations (Similarities/Differences)
MethodologyIn this article, the main methodology used is systematic review of the concept of prehabilitation in understanding the increased dependence on alcohol and how nursing professionals and other stakeholders can mitigate the issue through effective care provision. The article notes the increased barriers due to alcohol dependence that hinder nurse professionals from effectively addressing patient needs when they visit their care facilities. The expected harm, risks and proactive planning are critical to preventing the injury or harm and allow participants to cope with the dangers or risks. The authors review existing evidence from animal models, psychological experimental studies and pharmacological studies.The study used interviews where providers from the selected Veterans Administration (VA) clinics completed in-person semi-structured interviews that the researchers recorded, transcribed and analyzed by suing social marketing model and thematic analysis.In those studies, the researchers focused on barriers that hinder providers from effective care delivery in different settings with alcohol use disorder (AUD) patients. Both show the need for participation of stakeholders to get a realistic view of the magnitude of the problem.  In both processes, the researchers are active participants who engage in different components of the studies. However, the studies differ since the qualitative article contains data from providers in their actual setting and practice areas while the translational article conducts a review of existing literature to offer their findings.  
GoalsTranslational research can use different approaches with the goal of getting sufficient information and resources from various disciplines and studies so as to offer evidence-based findings that support effective care delivery for individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in health practice settings. In this case, the goal of the study was to review evidence on the concept of prehabilitation as linked to alcohol dependence. The study shows that the need to provide patient care is inhibited by different aspects of alcohol dependence among patient drinkers.The goal of the qualitative study was to describe barriers and facilitators in prescription of AUD medications in primary care settings and the provider’s beliefs in these settings and their attitude to provision of and willingness to prescribe AUD medications.In studies, the researchers review evidence about the provision of care to patients with alcohol abuse disorder. The translational study shows that providers face individual patient barriers while the qualitative study shows that provider-based barriers hinder effective provision of prescribed drugs to help the patients.
Data CollectionThe article gathered its data from past and existing literature and discusses the use of Structured Preparation for Alcohol Detoxification (SPADe) as an illustration of its application in clinical practice.The study collects data from in-person semi-structure interviews. The researchers divide the participants into two groups based on a review of their consensus.The two articles have different ways of collecting data where the qualitative study uses interviews while the translational research relies on past data and analyses it based on their tool, SPADe.

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research

            CriteriaPeer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: The future of translational research on alcohol use disorder. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12903 Translational Research Type: Translational research type 3 (T3)Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Barriers for identification and treatment of problem drinkers in primary care. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.009 Traditional Quantitative Research Type: Use of questionnairesObservations (Similarities/Differences)
MethodologyThe study uses evidence from a scientific meeting conducted at the University of California in Los Angeles, to discuss models in expediting the translation of scientific evidence to the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). The study offers a summary of the present state of AUD treatment and accessible evidence-based interventions and their use in clinical settings.The participants completed an ad hoc questionnaire as the researchers also collected evidence on main barriers that the providers faced in their practice settings. The methodology used by the two studies are different. The quantitative article uses realistic participants, 107 health professionals where close to 63% were medical professionals while about 32% were nurses. Both use participants’ views to collect evidence on the barriers impacting delivery. Both studies focus on existing literature
GoalsThe goal of the study is to review the use of different treatment interventions for AUD based on existing evidence and how translational science models and their effects affect the public health sector. The study emphasizes the need for scientists to bolster clinical use of their research findings to expedite knowledge translation into patient care provisionThe goal of the study was to provide an analysis of the various barriers perceived by health professionals dealing with problem drinkers from the Spanish population. These providers face barriers in their efforts to identify and treat these individuals. The study also analyzes the need to understand the potential differences among the health professional teams.The goals of the two studies differ since the translational one focuses on using effective evidence in the treatment process of individuals with the AUD while the second looks at barriers that hinder provider’s use of prescribed medications. The second article or quantitative article conducts primary research on the issue while the translational one looks at how to implement scientific knowledge and research evidence in patient care provision.
Data CollectionThe article collects data from past studies and the evidence offered at the conference from participants. The study reviews the existing barriers to care provision by nurses on individuals battling alcohol use disorders.The article collected data from participants; healthcare professionals that include physicians and nurses, using questionnaire. The data was on main barriers that they encounter from patients referred to them from different settings. Both articles focus on the importance of data and its effective analysis in generating increased knowledge and application in clinical settings. Both studies emphasize the need to better interventions and translation of research findings and applications in clinical practice. The articles differ in their use of primary and secondary data and their analytical tools.

Conclusion

Translational and tradition types of research have differences in their use of methodologies, collection and analysis of data and even their goals. These differences and similarities are important and nurse practitioners need to understand them to effective offer care and know certain barriers that hinder the overall process of treatment. Therefore, the translational graphic organizer offers an opportunity for them to understand these variations.

References

Coloma-Carmona, A., Carballo, J. L. & Tirado-Gonzalez, S. (2017). Barriers for identification and treatment of problem drinkers in

            primary care. Gaceta Sanitaria, 31(2): 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.009

Kouimtsidis, C., Duka, T., Palmer, E., & Lingford-Hughes, A. (2019). Prehabilitation in alcohol dependence as a treatment model for sustainable outcomes. A narrative review of literature on the risks associated with detoxification, from animal models to human translational research. Frontiers in psychiatry, 10, 339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00339

Ray, L. A., Grodin, E. N., Leggio, L., Bechtholt, A. J., Becjker, H., …Ewing, S. W. F & O’Malley, S. (2020). The future of translational research on alcohol use disorder. Addiction Biology, 26(2): e12903

Williams, E. C., Achtmeyer, C. E., Young, J. P., Berger, D., Curran, G., Bradley, K. A., … & Harris, A. H. (2018). Barriers to and facilitators of alcohol use disorder pharmacotherapy in primary care: a qualitative study in five VA clinics. Journal of general internal medicine, 33(3), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4202-z