Diverse Population Health Policy Analysis

Select a current or proposed health care policy that is designed to provide equitable health care for a diverse population. Create a 12-15-slide PowerPoint presentation discussing the health care policy and how it improves a specific population’s access to quality, cost-effective health care. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. Include additional slides for the title and references.

Include the following in your presentation:

1. Describe the policy selected.
2. Discuss the diverse population that will be affected by this policy.

¡Population of Interest: mental health patients

¡Demographics: US adults and children

Defining Characteristics

¡Struggling with mental health

¡Vulnerable to substance abuse

¡Highly stigmatized

¡Often misunderstood and undertreated

¡Social isolation and psychological stress

SPEAKER NOTES

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Diverse Population Health Policy Analysis

As the policy states, the population of focus is people with mental health problems. S.Res. 254 addresses the need for both adults and children. This population struggle with mental health well-being and are vulnerable to substance abuse (Carbonell et al., 2020). Given this, their problems and vulnerability to other health issues and complications increase proportionately. Vaccari et al. (2020) further found that people with mental health problems are highly stigmatized since their conditions are not sufficiently understood. They need support as much as possible. Loades et al. (2020) also noted that people with mental health problems are victims of social isolation and psychological stress. Awareness programs and prioritizing their needs will reduce the overall impact of COVID-19 and related problems.

1. Explain how the policy is designed to improve cost-effectiveness and health care equity for the diverse population.
2. Discuss why the policy is financially sound and explain how the policy incorporates the nursing perspective and relevant ethical, legal, and political

   

   factors. Provide rationale to support your explanation.

3. Describe what state, federal, global health policies, or goals the policy is related to and explain the degree to which each helps achieve equitable health care for the diverse population.
4. Discuss advocacy strategies for improving access, quality, and cost-effective health care for the diverse population selected.
5. Discuss the professional and moral obligation of master’s prepared nurses to respect human dignity and advance the common good through working to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations from a Christian perspective.

You are required to cite eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Read Also: NUR 550 Topic 6 DQ 2 Discuss how to integrate appropriate information and communication technologies for the clinical preventative intervention in DQ 1 to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

2.1: Examine financially sound health care policy that incorporates the nursing perspective and relevant ethical, legal, and political factors.

2.2: Determine advocacy strategies for improving access, quality, and cost-effective health care for diverse populations.

4.2: Integrate appropriate state, federal, and global health policies and goals into the design of equitable health care for populations.

4.3: Examine the professional and moral obligation of master’s-prepared nurses to respect human dignity and advance the common good through working to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations from a Christian perspective.

APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☐  The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ Topic is well defined.

☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.

Translational research identifies healthcare gaps and enables researchers to conduct evidence-based research, which can then be translated into evidence-based practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes. New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation on February 16th, 2021, allowing advanced care providers to distribute identification cards to individuals suffering from Chron’s disease, colitis, or requiring ostomy care. This bill was passed to assist those suffering from Chron’s disease and colitis. Employee restrooms at businesses that sell goods and services to the general public are permitted under this Bill. Customers or employees who meet the criteria for a Chrons and Colitis identification card may use the employee restroom whether they are an employee, paying customer, or not. This is a significant achievement for people with chrons who must use an ostomy. Ostomy care necessitates continuous care and allows you to provide care as well as change/manage ostomy sites in a timely and appropriate manner. The lack of access to restrooms was discovered through translational research. Popove et al. carried out a study that identified the emotional, physical, and psychological challenges that people face while living with these healthcare conditions, such as making special arrangements with school and work for frequent restroom access and clinic appointments (Popev et al., 2021). While Chron’s and Colitis are not commonly discussed in public, the passage of this bill should provide relief to those who are afflicted and show that these issues are being addressed.

“Design of Equitable Care (C4.2): Integration of State, Federal, and Global Health Policies and Goals” 10.0% The state, federal, and global health policies or goals to which the policy is linked, as well as the extent to which each contributes to equitable health care for a diverse population, are not discussed. The state, federal, and global health policies or goals to which the policy is related, as well as the extent to which each contributes to equitable health care for a diverse population, are only briefly discussed. The state, federal, and global health policies or goals to which the policy is related, as well as the extent to which each contributes to equitable health care for a diverse population, are summarized. Some details are unclear or incorrect. The policy’s relationship to state, federal, and global health policies or goals, as well as the extent to which each contributes to equitable health care for a diverse population, are adequately discussed. For clarity or accuracy, some detail is required. The policy’s relationship to state, federal, and global health policies or goals, as well as the extent to which each contributes to equitable health care for a diverse population, are thoroughly explained. The story is true and well-supported.

“Advocacy Strategies for Improving Health Care Access, Quality, and Cost-Effectiveness (C2.2)” 10.0% There is no discussion of advocacy strategies for improving access, quality, and cost-effective health care for the diverse population chosen. Advocacy strategies for improving access, quality, and affordability of health care for the diverse population chosen are insufficient. The selected population’s general advocacy strategies for improving access, quality, and cost-effective health care are summarized. More information and assistance are required. Advocacy strategies for improving access, quality, and affordability of health care for the diverse population chosen are discussed. For clarity or accuracy, some detail is required. Advocacy strategies that have been well-developed for improving access, quality, and cost-effective health care for the diverse population chosen are discussed.

“Examination of Responsibilities of Master’s Prepared Nurses
(C4.3)” 10.0% The professional and moral obligation of master’s prepared nurses to respect human dignity and advance the common good through working to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations from a Christian perspective are not discussed. The professional and moral obligation of master’s prepared nurses to respect human dignity and advance the common good through working to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations from a Christian perspective are only partially discussed. The professional and moral obligation of master’s prepared nurses to respect human dignity and advance the common good through working to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations from a Christian perspective are summarized. Some aspects are unclear. Rationale or support is needed. The professional and moral obligation of master’s prepared nurses to respect human dignity and advance the common good through working to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations from a Christian perspective are adequately discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. “Well-developed advocacy strategies for improving access, quality, and cost-effective health care for the diverse population selected are discussed.
The professional and moral obligation of master’s prepared nurses to respect human dignity and advance the common good through working to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations from a Christian perspective are thoroughly discussed. The narrative is insightful and well supported.”

Presentation of Content 15.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout 10.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Topic 8 DQ 1

Discuss the role of translational research in advancing equitable access to health care and preventative services and policies based on population health. Provide an example of a local health care policy that has been recently enacted and or is awaiting legislative passage that has been influenced by research.

Topic 8 DQ 2

As an advanced registered nurse, discuss your future role in advocating for equitable population health services and policies. Do you anticipate any challenges or barriers to “population advocacy”? How would you meet these challenges?

Re: Topic 8 DQ 2

Population advocacy is the ability to advocate for the whole population, this includes the poor and vulnerable in all walks of life, this is not just advocation for a select group- it is the ability to advocate for the social, economically disadvantages populations (Williams et al., 2018). Any person can be poor and vulnerable at any point in their life. The role of a nurse is to not only advocate for the individual patient but also to be involves as a nurse to advocate for the health of a population. Advocacy is an important and difficult part of an advanced practices nurse, part of these are difficulties are advocating for a vulnerable population, without a culture supporting it, such as trying to advocate for a homeless community to get housing when there may be a culture of the community is to remain in their homeless community. Overcoming these difficulties of the nurse is to look at the question differently, and to have a “think out of the box” mentality(Poghosyan & Carthon, 2017). An advanced practice nurse advocates for a population by looking at the greater good. This can be done through asking the question of how to protect the community or even start with small all the parts the community through individualized plans and forming a standard of practice that helps the community. Advance practice nurses can develop their ability to advocate for patients and can enhance this skill through becoming involved, exploring their resources to help through education to come possible.

Poghosyan, L., & Carthon, J. (2017). The untapped potential of the nurse practitioner workforce in reducing health disparities. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 18(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154417721189

Williams, S. D., PhD, MPH, APRN, Philips, J. M., PhD, RN, CENP, FAAN, & Koyama, K., MSN, RN, PHN, CNS. (2018). Nurse Advocacy: Adopting a Health in All Policies Approach. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(31), 1–12. https://doi.org/DOI:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No03Man01