NRS 433 What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study?
NRS 433 What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study?
NRS 433 What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study?
Nursing research is performed by utilizing various sorts of techniques such as qualitative, quantitative, experimental, etc, and descriptive approaches. Qualitative research is regarded as experimental analysis for the deep knowledge of the research difficulty and delivers a way for quantitative research. In a few studies, both qualitative and quantitative techniques employed in the investigations are called mixed forms of study.
The advantages of mixed techniques can be utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methods to minimize the weakness of the study. It improves the questioning and statistical breakdown of the study and mixed-methods gain the availability of analysis tools that help to accumulate more comprehensive data. Additionally, mixed-method facilitates personal biases.
The disadvantages of mixed methods are utilizing both qualitative and quantitative procedures is time-consuming and investigators require to be well-versed in both the data. More aids are to be used for gathering both types of data. Finally, the development findings should be represented distinctly for a better performance of the audience.
Grand Canyon University (Ed). (2018). Nursing research: Understanding methods for best practice. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1
Using both qualitative and quantitative methods is called mixed methods. Quantitative data helps with supporting qualitative research it identifies patients or cases and qualitative data shows how quantitative helps develop the conceptual model. For example, using both (mixed) with data collection quantitative data provides the baseline and helps with what type of patients to select for a study and qualitative data will help with understanding the barriers the patients may experience with doing the research which can affect recruitment and retention for a study, for example, if you are doing a trail that patient must show up to the barrier maybe transportation. (Doorenbos 2014). Quantitative and qualitative research is important in nursing because nurses use the information from research to take care of their patients. It is used to best evaluate an intervention for patients. An example would be turning a patient every two hours to prevent pressure ulcers or given protein drinks to help with healing, these are effective methods of intervention because it has been tested and provided through research, nurses gather information with assessments to care for patients the collect of information is the same as using mixed methods you found out something about a patient you assess and look for barriers and then proceed on the care of your patients. (Lamar university 2017)
Doorenbos A. Z. (2014). Mixed Methods in Nursing Research: An Overview and Practical Examples. Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research, 47(3), 207–217.
Nurses and Qualitative Research | Lamar University Online September 2017
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NRS 433 What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study?:
Qualitative and quantitative research is the basis for all of the evidenced based practices that we utilize in hospitals around America and in all our practices as nurses. Quantitative utilizes data collected to determine trends and find hypotheses accepted (Grand Canyon University, 2018). Quantitative research allows for large sample sizes to be analyzed and increased reliability in terms of what the data proves (Noyes et al., 2019). A disadvantage is the expensive cost to run a large research study and collect enough data (Noyes et al., 2019). On the other hand, qualitative research is more interested in looking at non numerical data and utilizing it to help determine the acceptance of a hypothesis (Grand Canyon University, 2018). A big advantage to qualitative is the ease at which it is to collect data using surveys, but it has the disadvantage of increased difficulty with research replication (Noyes et al., 2019).
References
Grand Canyon University (Ed). (2018). Nursing research: Understanding methods for best practice. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1
Noyes, J., Booth, A., Moore, G., Flemming, K., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ global health, 4(Suppl 1), e000893. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893 \
Combining elements of quantitative and qualitative research in a study is known as “Mixed methods”. Mixed method is belief to help gain more complete picture of the study than using just the quantitative or qualitative research method alone, this is because it integrates the benefit of both methods (George, 2021). It is often used in the behavioral, health, and social sciences, especially in multidisciplinary settings and complex situational or societal research.
The advantages of Mixed method research include, enabling a research question to be studied from different perspectives. For example, the rich, subjective insights on complex realities from qualitative inquiry can be combined with the standardized, generalizable data generated through quantitative research. When applied, mixed method research allows respective strengths and weaknesses of each approach to complement each other. Mixed method research enables a pragmatic path forward to conduct health outcomes measurement research in rare disease populations or populations that are often difficult to recruit for research purposes e.g., pediatrics, acute mental health, palliative (Regnault et.,2018).
Disadvantage: Mixed method research is demanding in terms of methodological skillsets. It requires a team of researchers who are experienced in both qualitative and quantitative research, and in mixed method research. It also requires additional resources and time.
Reference
Regnault, A., Willgoss, T., Barbic, S. (2018). Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research. Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8
Tegan, G. (2021). An Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/mixed-methods-research/
Qualitative and quantitative research are the most sought out research designs in health care research as they help the researchers to expand and strengthen their knowledge. While the quantitative design is focus on collecting the data from a large number of participants to increase the possibility to generalize the findings to a wider population, the qualitative design provides a deeper understanding of the issue being investigated, honoring the voices of its participants(Schoonenboom, et,al , 2017). While both studies have their advantages and disadvantages, combining them together in research study will help the researcher to unfold the answer to the scientific explanation but mixed method design is providing an overall systematic research study with high level of validity and reliability. According to Dawadi, wt, al (2021) a mixed-methods design provide best chance of answering research questions by combining two sets of strengths while compensating at the same time for the weaknesses of each method(Dawadi, et, al 2021). In other words the mixed method design strengthen the study’s s conclusions as the study combines both qualitative and quantitative designs. By definition , “mixed methods research is the type of research in which a researcher or team of researchers combines elements of qualitative and quantitative research approaches for the broad purposes of breadth and depth of understanding and corroboration”.( Schoonenboom, et,al , 2017). Mixed methods help the researcher to look at issue from a broader perceptive as the combination of both qualitative and quantitative study helps to generalize the findings to a population and develop a detailed view of the meaning of a phenomenon or concept for individuals. While mixed methods are becoming more and more famous, there are many challenges that this study has and one of the main challenges is that this is a lengthy process starting from the data collection , analysis and the outcome of the study. Another big challenge for the mixed method researcher has been the difficulty in choosing which design to use for the study.
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on Its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36.
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
A research study is significant for conducting the study. There are various quantitative designs developed for conducting research, such as descriptive, correlation, quasi-experiemental, and experimental studies. Qualitative research is primarily exploratory research. Quantitative models of research tend to produce results that can be generalized. However, qualitative studies tend to produce results that are less easy to generalize. Quantitative analysis uses data that are structured in the form of numbers, they are considered qualitative. Mixed methods research refers to those studies or lines of inquiry that integrate one or more qualitative and quantitative techniques for data collection and analysis. The term “mixed methods” refers to a new methodology of research that advances the systematic integration, or “mixing,” of quantitative and qualitative data within a single investigation or sustained program of inquiry (Grove et al., 2015).
The advantages of the qualitative methods provide depth and detail data about the patient’s health. It helps in recording the attitudes, feelings, and behaviors of the patents while they are undergoing treatment or when they are diagnoses with health issues. It provides more content that is useful for practical application. Through this, it encourages healthcare officers to solve various health issues of the patients. Mixed methods have numerous advantages, in that they are helpful to understand the contradiction between the several types of studies, mixed studies add a wide range to multidisciplinary teams and interaction of qualitative and quantitative research. Lastly, mixed methods collect more comprehensive data and a more narration than just one type alone (AHRQ, 2013).
Mixed methods also have some disadvantages that are; mixed methods studies are complex to plan and conduct. Another disadvantage is conducting high-quality mixed methods studies requires a multidisciplinary team od researchers who, in the service of the more extensive study, must be open to methods that may not be their area of expertise. Mixed methods studies are labor-intensive and require more excellent resources and time than those needed to conduct a single method study. In my view, the numbers obtained from quantitative research can validate the qualitative data that is collected by interviewing participants. A mixed-method of research gives a deeper meaning and understanding of the information that is collected, and the researcher can see from both ways of research (Grove et al., 2015).
References:
Grove, S., Gray, J., & Burns, N. (2015). Understanding Nursing Research, 6th Edition. Retrieved from https://pageburstls.elsevier.com/#/books/9781455770601/
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2013). Mixed Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis While Studying Patient-Centered Medical Home Models. Retrieved from https:..pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/MixedMethods_032513comp.pdf