Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor

NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Question

Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.

Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

General Requirements

You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor

NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor

NRS 433 Revise the PICOT Question you Wrote in the Topic 1 Assignment Using the Feedback you Received from your Instructor

Attachments

NRS-433V-RS5-ResearchCritiquePICOTGuidelines.docxNRS-433V-RS5-Research-Critique-PICO

Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft – Rubric

Criteria Description

Evidence of Revision

5. 5: Excellent

26 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

4. 4: Good

24.44 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.58 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.

Criteria Description

Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included.

Criteria Description

Background of Studies

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Method of Studies

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Results of Studies

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Ethical Considerations

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Conclusion

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

Criteria Description

PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship

5. 5: Excellent

26 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.

4. 4: Good

24.44 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.58 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.

Criteria Description

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

5. 5: Excellent

26 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.

4. 4: Good

24.44 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.58 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. 5: Excellent

26 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. 4: Good

24.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.58 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. 5: Excellent

26 points

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. 4: Good

24.44 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.58 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. 5: Excellent

26 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

24.44 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.58 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

All format elements are correct.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. 5: Excellent

13 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. 4: Good

12.22 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory

10.79 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.75 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 260 points

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total 190 points

Criterion

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3. 3: Satisfactory

4. 4: Good

5. 5: Excellent

Ethical Considerations

Ethical Considerations

0 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete.

21.38 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions.

23.65 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed.

26.79 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity.

28.5 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented.

Results of Study

Results of Study

0 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.

21.38 points

A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.

23.65 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.

26.79 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

28.5 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue

Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue

0 points

Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.

21.38 points

A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required.

23.65 points

A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed.

26.79 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support.

28.5 points

A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

7.13 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

7.89 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

8.93 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

9.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

7.13 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

7.89 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

8.93 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

9.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

7.13 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

7.89 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

8.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

9.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Qualitative Studies

Qualitative Studies

0 points

Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.

7.13 points

Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.

7.89 points

N/A

8.93 points

N/A

9.5 points

Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

7.13 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

7.89 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

8.93 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

9.5 points

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Method of Study

Method of Study

0 points

Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.

21.38 points

A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

23.65 points

A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed.

26.79 points

A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity.

28.5 points

A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.

Background of Study

Background of Study

0 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.

14.25 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

15.77 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

17.86 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

19 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

7.13 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

7.89 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

8.93 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

9.5 points

All format elements are correct.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.
error: