NRS 427V Week 2 Benchmark Assignment Epidemiology Paper (Chickenpox)

NRS 427V Week 2 Benchmark Assignment Epidemiology Paper (Chickenpox) Recent

In a written paper of 1,200-1,500 words, apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Choose one communicable disease from the following list:

Chickenpox

Tuberculosis

Influenza

Mononucleosis

Hepatitis B (Selected)

HIV

Include the following in your assignment:

Description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence).

Describe the determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.

Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. (The textbook describes each element of the epidemiologic triangle).

Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding,
reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up).

Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organization(s) contributes to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.

A minimum of three references is required.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 427V Week 2 Benchmark Assignment Epidemiology Paper (Chickenpox)

NRS 427V Week 2 Benchmark Assignment Epidemiology Paper (Chickenpox)

Rubric Criteria

Total 125 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.	0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.	5 points Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.	5.5 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.	5.75 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.	6.25 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development	0 points Description of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.	10 points Paper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development.	11 points Paper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease.	11.5 points Paper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression.	12.5 points Paper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points.
National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease	0 points Agency and description of contribution are omitted.	10 points An agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen.	11 points An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking.	11.5 points An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief.	12.5 points An agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered.
Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.	0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.	5 points Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.	5.5 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.	5.75 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.	6.25 points Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest	0 points Demographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.	10 points Limited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study.	11 points Overview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors.	11.5 points Clinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate.	12.5 points Overview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.	0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	2.2 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	2.3 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	2.5 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.	0 points The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.	5 points The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.	5.5 points The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.	5.75 points The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.	6.25 points The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors	0 points Description of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.	20 points The communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present.	22 points The communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle.	23 points The communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented.	25 points The communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included.
Global Implication Global Implication	0 points Global implication of the disease is omitted or unclear.	10 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided.	11 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.	11.5 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.	12.5 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.	0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.	3 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.	3.3 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.	3.45 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.	3.75 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data	0 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear.	20 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided.	22 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized.	23 points Discussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented.	25 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

5 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

5.5 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

5.75 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

6.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development

0 points

Description of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.

10 points

Paper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development.

11 points

Paper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease.

11.5 points

Paper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression.

12.5 points

Paper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points.

National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease

0 points

Agency and description of contribution are omitted.

10 points

An agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen.

11 points

An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking.

11.5 points

An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief.

12.5 points

An agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

5 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

5.5 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

5.75 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

6.25 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest

0 points

Demographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.

10 points

Limited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study.

11 points

Overview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors.

11.5 points

Clinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate.

12.5 points

Overview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2.2 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2.3 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

2.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

5.5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

5.75 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

6.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors

0 points

Description of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.

20 points

The communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present.

22 points

The communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle.

23 points

The communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented.

25 points

The communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included.

Global Implication

0 points

Global implication of the disease is omitted or unclear.

10 points

A discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided.

11 points

A discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.

11.5 points

A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.

12.5 points

A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

3 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

3.3 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

3.45 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3.75 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data

0 points

Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear.

20 points

Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided.

22 points

Discussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized.

23 points

Discussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented.

25 points

Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented.

APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.

NRS 427V Week 2 Benchmark Assignment Epidemiology Paper (Chickenpox)