NRS 415 Personal Reflection

NRS 415 Personal Reflection

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on your collaborative practice within the CLC Health Organization Evaluation assignment.

In 250-500 words, answer the following:

  1. Describe the communication tools and techniques used by your team. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the group when collaborating to complete this project?
  2. What strategy, or approach, would improve your collaborative practice in future projects?
  3. When working in a health care setting, how would interprofessional collaboration work to support quality and the improvement of patient outcomes?

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assigning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 6.2.

Rubric Criteria

Total30 points

Criterion1. Unsatisfactory2. Insufficient3. Approaching4. Acceptable5. Target
CLC Team CollaborationDescribe the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group.0 pointsA description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is not included.6.75 pointsA description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is incomplete or incorrect.7.11 pointsA description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is included but lacks detail.8.01 pointsA description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is detailed.9 pointsA description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is thorough.
Interprofessional CollaborationDescribe how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes.0 pointsA description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is not included.6.75 pointsA description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.7.11 pointsA description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is included but lacks detail.8.01 pointsA description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is detailed.9 pointsA description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is thorough.
Strategy to Improve CollaborationDiscuss a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice.0 pointsA discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is not included.6.75 pointsA discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is incomplete or incorrect.7.11 pointsA discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is included but lacks detail.8.01 pointsA discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is detailed.9 pointsA discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is thorough.
Mechanics of WritingIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.1.35 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.1.42 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.1.6 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.1.8 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/DocumentationUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.0.9 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.0.95 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.1.07 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.1.2 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.