NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Recent
NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Recent
NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Recent
Policymaker Electronic Presentation
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3).
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)
(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10)
(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10)
Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points:275 points
Requirements
Assignment Criteria for Presentation
1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.
2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.
4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.
6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.
Preparing the Presentation
After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.
Category Points % Description
Visit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation)
Policymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
Reflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.
Future Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting/presentation and their importance to nursing.
Conclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.
APA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.
Presentation/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.
Total 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria Exceptional
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds
(88%)
Very good or high level of performance Meets
(80%)
Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement
(38%)
Poor or failing level of performance Developing
(0)
Unsatisfactory level of performance
Content
Possible Points = 245 Points
Visit Description 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation) Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.
Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.
Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy..
Policymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.
Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.
Reflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.
Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.
Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.
There is no reflection on process.
Future Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing.
Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no Discussion of importance to nursing.
Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.
Conclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 Points
Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.
Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.
Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.
Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.
No conclusion.
Content Subtotal _____of 245 points
Format
Possible Points = 30 Points
APA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.
There are 2-3 APA format errors.
There are 4-6 APA format errors.
There are 6-7 APA format errors.
Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing
Presentation/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.
Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.
Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.
Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.
Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.
Format Subtotal _____of 30 points
Total Points _____of 275 points
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the
correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the
conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Check Out Also: DQ: RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.