Implementation Plan In Research

Implementation Plan In Research

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:    Implementation Plan In Research    

Implementation Plan In Research


While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000-word review that includes the following sections:

Title page
Introduction section
A comparison of research questions
A comparison of sample populations
A comparison of the limitations of the study
A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Insert your name and surname in the space provided above, as well as in the file name. Save the file as: First name Surname Assignment 4 – e.g. Lilly Smith Assignment 4. NB: Please ensure that you use the name that appears in your student profile on the Online Campus.
Article 5
Article 6
Article 7
Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

Fetter, S. D., Scherr, R. E., Linless, D. J., Dharmar, M., Sara, E. Schaefer, E. S., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S.

DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2018.1436477
Lydecke, J. A., Riley, K. E., & Grilo, C. M.

DOI: 10.1002/eat.22858
Marcum, C. S., Goldring M. R., McBride, C. M., & Persky, S.

DOI: 10.1093/abm/kax041
Vollmer, R. L.


Article Title and Year Published

Effect of the Shaping Healthy Choices Program, a Multicomponent, School-Based Nutrition Intervention, on Physical Activity Intensity.

Year published: 2018
Associations of parents’ self, child, and other “fat talk” with child eating behaviors and weight.

Year published: 2018
Modeling Dynamic Food Choice Processes to Understand Dietary Intervention Effects.

Year published: 2018
An Exploration of How Fathers Attempt to Prevent Childhood Obesity in Their Families.

Year published: 2018
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

The main aim of the study was to determine whether physical activity patterns improved School-Based Nutrition intervention.
The study aimed at identifying the relationship between parenting and eating behaviour and how they all relate wo weight gain.
The article aimed at identifying limitations in dietary behaviour and how micro-level choices undertaken by people on a daily basis affect it as an intervention to obesity.
The objective of the article was to understand how fathers, a parent, understand overweight preschoolers
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)


Youth enrolled in a Shaping Healthy Choices Program
581 Parents of preadolescents or adolescents
221 mothers
117 US fathers with an average of 35 years, 85% white
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

Pre and post-intervention assessments were conducted alongside a control experiment

Youth at the control and intervention schools wore a Polar Active monitor on their non-dominant wrist 24 h/d for at least 2 consecutive days.
Parents were interviewed and asked if they talk about weight gain (fat talk) with their children (pre-adolescents and adolescents.
The study modelled the choices of the 221 mothers who had adopted an information-based intervention for their children.
Online survey with nine questions.


Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate change in physical activity


Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Fat-Talk was categorized into self‐fat talk, obesity‐fat talk and child-fat-talk. All these were analyzed based on the responses given by each parent
Relational event modeling, where participants were grouped into control information, childhood obesity risk information and childhood obesity risk information plus a personalized family history
Content analysis was used to analyze their responses using constant comparative method
Key Findings

There were no significant differences in the change in MVPA between the schools.

A bigger percentage of parents admit to talking to their children about obesity i.e. child-fat talk. Generally, sons are easier to talk to than daughters
The results indicated that choice inertia decreased and the overall rate of food selection increased among participants receiving the strongest intervention condition
From the results of the survey, it was revealed that there are distinct causes of childhood obesity that can be prevented or treated using parents, specifically, fathers. They can be used to identify child excess weight at an early stage and work towards correcting the situation. This also includes identifying barriers to changing behaviour and overcoming them.

According to the authors, the overall small physical activity intensity pattern shift supports that physical activity is an important area to target within a multicomponent nutrition intervention aimed at preventing childhood obesity.
The study recommended the use of different types of talks about obesity.
The study therefore recommended that better food choices can help make any dietary behaviour intervention better
The article therefore recommends fathers as the best parents to base the intervention on. It also recommends engaging mothers as well.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

The study provides an in-depth analysis into how physical activity can be used as an intervention to prevent childhood obesity. The results will be used to compare with those found after the capstone project is complete.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.