DNP 810 Full Course Assignments Tasks GCU

DNP 810 Full Course Assignments Tasks GCU

DNP 810 Topic 1 Individual Success Plan (ISP) Part 1

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 810 Topic 1 Individual Success Plan (ISP) Part 1

The Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment in this course requires your collaboration with the course faculty early on to establish a plan for successful completion of mutually identified and agreed upon specific deliverables for your programmatic requirements. Programmatic requirements are: (1) completion of required practice immersion hours, (2) completion of work associated with program competencies, (3) work associated toward completion of your Direct Practice Improvement Project.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment as it pertains to deliverables due in this course:

  1. Locate and download the Individual Success Plan (ISP) document in the DNP Program Documents folder in the DNP Program Materials section of the DC Network.
  2. Review the DNP Program Milestones document in the DC Network and identify which milestones apply to this course. Note: Not all courses have milestones.
  3. Determine what practice experiences you plan to seek to address each competency. Include how many hours you plan to set aside to meet your goals. Learners will apply concepts from each of their core courses to reflect upon, critically examine, and improve current practice, and are required to integrate scholarly readings to develop case reports that demonstrate increasingly complex and proficient practice.
  4. Use the ISP to develop a personal plan for completing your practice hours and how competencies will be met. Show all the major milestones and deliverables.

Within the ISP, ensure you identify specific deliverables which can include the following: Individualized DNP practice immersion contracts; comprehensive clinical log of hours applied to doctoral level learning outcomes; learner evaluations; mentor evaluations; current and updated CV; scholarly activities; GCU DNP competency self-assessment; reflective journal; course goals and plan for how competencies and practice immersion hours will be met; faculty and mentor approvals of course goals and documented practice immersion hours; and DPI project milestones.

Directions:

  1. Identify the specific deliverables you will complete throughout this course from those defined above or others negotiated with your faculty. You must turn in a new ISP in each course.
  2. Identify the remaining deliverables you will complete in the upcoming courses.
  3. List the challenges you expect to encounter as you continue the practice hour and competency requirements throughout this course? How might you overcome these challenges?
  4. You can renegotiate these deliverables with your faculty throughout this course and update your ISP accordingly.
  5. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  6. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  7. You not are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Complete the Contact Information table at the beginning of the ISP document and type in your signature and the date on which you completed the table.

Read the information in the ISP document including the following:

  1. Learner Expectations
  2. Derivation of the ISP
  3. Instructions for completing the ISP

Follow the instructions and complete the ISP.

DNP 810 Topic 1 Family History

Taking a family history is a critical step in determining current and future health and educational needs. A comprehensive health history can be completed using a variety of tools. The Surgeon General’s Family Health History tool is part of the larger Family Health History Initiative, which encourages people to talk about and write down health issues that appear to run in families, focusing attention on this critical issue. This assignment allows the learner to practice using the tool and become acquainted with the initiative.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 810 Topic 1 Individual Success Plan (ISP) Part 1

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
    DNP 810 Topic 1 Individual Success Plan (ISP) Part 1
    DNP 810 Topic 1 Individual Success Plan (ISP) Part 1

    expectations for successful completion.

  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

Use the “My Family Health Portrait” to document your own family history.

Designate a proband for the pedigree with a disease or condition of interest.

Write a summary (750-1,000 words) of your findings. Include the following information:

  1. Discuss of the heredity patterns discovered.
  2. Evaluate the risk of transmission to other/new family members.
  3. Propose the feasibility of using this tool in your own practice.

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Rubric Criteria

Total80 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to as

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

3.52 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

3.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

4 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

3.2 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

3.52 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

3.68 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

4 points

All format elements are correct.

Discussion of the Heredity Patterns Discovered

Discussion of the Heredity Patterns Discovered

0 points

Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is not present.

16 points

Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is present but incomplete.

17.6 points

Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is present but done at a perfunctory level.

18.4 points

Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.

20 points

Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Proposal of the Feasibility of Using This Tool in Practice

Proposal of the Feasibility of Using This Tool in Practice

0 points

Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in practice is not presented.

12.8 points

Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in practice is presented but incomplete.

14.08 points

Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in practice is presented but done at a perfunctory level.

14.72 points

Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in practice is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly sources, but some outdated sources are used.

16 points

Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in practice is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the thesis. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

5.12 points

Sufficient justification of thesis is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

5.63 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of the thesis. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

5.89 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression in support of the thesis from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

6.4 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents persuasive evidence in support of the thesis in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing thesis.

4.48 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague; purpose is not clear.

4.93 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

5.15 points

Thesis is clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

5.6 points

Thesis is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Evaluation of the Risk of Transmission to Other/New Family Members

Evaluation of the Risk of Transmission to Other/New Family Members

0 points

Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is not present.

16 points

Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is present but incomplete.

17.6 points

Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is present but done at a perfunctory level.

18.4 points

Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is clearly present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.

20 points

Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

DNP 810 Topic 2 Case Study: Part 1

You will be creating a case study in stages over four course topics. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization in which you practice may specialize in treating.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

For this assignment (Part 1 of the “Case Study”), write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) incorporating genetics information learned from assigned readings in Topics 1 and 2. Include the following:

  1. Description of the disease, its prevalence, and its incidence.
  2. Discussion of laboratory testing that is possible.
  3. Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy).
  4. The role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism).
  5. The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 3 Case Study: Part 2

You will be creating a case study in stages over four course topics. This assignment will add to your previous work in Topic 2. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or your own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization you practice in may specialize in treating.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

For this assignment (Part 2 of the “Case Study”), write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) incorporating genetics information learned from assigned readings in Topics 1-3. Include the following:

  1. Describe if chromosomal analysis is/was indicated.
  2. Detail the causes of the disorder.
  3. Describe the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education.
  4. Analyze the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs.

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 4 Genetic Counseling

With the increase in knowledge around genetic issues, it is important that all health care providers are prepared to have thorough genetic-based discussions now with their patients. In this assignment, you will synthesize your knowledge into a client case with a real or potential genetic health-related illness.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

Directions:

Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) addressing a client case that might benefit from the process of genetic counseling. Describe the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your completion of the family health portrait. Discuss the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions.

Imagine this assignment as if you are giving this counseling to a patient. Discuss the following:

  1. Health
  2. Prevention
  3. Screening
  4. Diagnostics
  5. Prognostics
  6. Selection of treatment
  7. Monitoring of treatment effectiveness

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 5 Case Study: Part 3

You will be creating a case study in stages over four course topics. This assignment will add to your previous work in Topic 3. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy, Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization you practice in may specialize in treating.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

For this assignment (Part 3 of the “Case Study”), write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) incorporating genetics information learned from assigned readings in Topics 1-5.

Include the following:

  1. Examine how genetics can influence policy issues.
  2. Discuss any nutritional influences for the cause of this disease.
  3. Discuss the process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health, prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment, and monitoring of treatment effectiveness.
  4. Discuss the prevalence rates, testing, treatment, and prognosis as they relate to human nutrition.

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 6 Health Issues for the Aging

As of 2017 health care expenditures in the United States are near 17.9% of our gross domestic product (GDP), with a major portion of Medicare funding going toward chronic illness and care at the last six months of life. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has made some initial legislative changes in our health system, but not sufficient enough to address our growing expenditures and caring for our large aging population. In this assignment, learners will synthesize issues in aging with health policy solutions by writing a paper on one health issue for older individuals addressed in the topic and offering a policy solution. Example of issue: In 2014, more than 50% of the costs of institutional long-term care for older persons are paid for with public funds from Medicaid.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that addresses a health issue for older individuals. Include the following:

  1. Evaluate what the literature suggests as a resolution to your chosen issue.
  2. Discuss any attempts to incorporate the solution into public policy.
  3. Determine the barriers to implementation of the solution.
  4. Analyze the options being discussed for public and/or private funding.
  5. Propose your own recommendation.

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 8 Individual Success Plan (ISP): Part 2

As instructed in Topic 1, The Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment in this course required your collaboration with the course faculty early on to establish a plan for successful completion of mutually identified and agreed upon specific deliverables for your programmatic requirements. These requirements were as follows: Programmatic requirements are: (1) completion of required practice immersion hours, (2) completion of work associated with program competencies, and (3) work associated toward completion of your Direct Practice Improvement Project.

Resubmit your updated and signed ISP.

DNP 810 Topic 8 Case Study: Cumulative Part 4

You will be creating a case study in stages over four course topics. This assignment will add to your previous work in Topic 5. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice immersion hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy, Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization you practice in may specialize in treating.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
  • Directions:

For this assignment (Conclusion of the “Case Study”), include Parts 1, 2, and 3 of the “Case Study” in one document, combined with additional genetics information learned from the assigned readings from all course topics. Make sure you have incorporated any faculty feedback received from previous reports. Do not copy/paste entire papers from Parts 1, 2 and 3. Create a document including only the following areas from previous case reports:

  1. Describe the disease, its prevalence, its incidence, and general knowledge of the disease.
  2. Discuss the laboratory testing that can be done.
  3. Describe if chromosomal analysis is/was indicated and detail the chromosomal change that caused the disease if it is a chromosomal disorder.
  4. Describe the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education.
  5. Describe the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs.
  6. Examine how genetics can influence policy issues.
  7. Discuss any nutritional influences for this disease.
  8. Process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health, prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment, and monitoring of treatment effectiveness.

In addition, your case study must include the following:

Part 4:

  1. Discuss any ethical considerations for this disease.
  2. Compare how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices.
  3. Discuss the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events.
  4. Create a plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder.

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 8 Reflective Journal

Learners are required to maintain a Reflective Journal integrating leadership and inquiry into current practice.

In your journal, you will reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the current course addressing a variable combination of the following: new practice approaches, intraprofessional collaboration, health care delivery and clinical systems, ethical considerations in health care, population health concerns, the role of technology in improving health care outcomes, health policy, leadership and economic models, and/or health disparities. Outline what you discovered about your professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, what additional resources and abilities could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and finally how you met the competencies aligned to this course.

Submit your Reflective Journal to both the instructor and the Typhon Tracking System under the corresponding course section. Learners must submit this deliverable in Typhon and LoudCloud. Failure to submit in both locations can result in an “Incomplete” for the course.

DNP 810 Topic 8 Scholarly Activities

Throughout the DNP Program, learners are required to provide a report documenting participation in a minimum of four scholarly activities outside of clinical or professional practice. These reports will be due in specific courses throughout the program (listed below).

Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, grand rounds, participating in policy and quality improvement committees, writing scholarly publications, participating in community planning, serving as a guest lecturer, etc. Involvement and contribution to interdisciplinary initiatives are also acceptable scholarly activities.

Documentation of these activities is required in DNP-810, DNP-820, DNP-830, and DNP-840.

A summary report of the scholarly activity including who, what, where, when, and take-home points will be submitted as the assignment. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity and the future professional goals related to this activity. You may use the attached template to help guide this assignment.

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 8 Practice Immersion Hours Portfolio

The Typhon Tracking System will be used to document and follow the status of your practice immersion hours throughout this and every subsequent course. Learners must be able to document a minimum of 50 concurrently or previously logged practice hours in association with this course, which will contribute to fulfillment of the total required 1,000 post-baccalaureate practice hours by the conclusion of the program. Review the Practice Immersion Hours Portfolio Required Elements below, then review the “Guidelines for Graduate Field Experience Manual” document in the DC Network for details on what may/may not qualify as practice hours.

Practice Immersion Hours Portfolio Required Elements

The Practice Hours Portfolio (using the Typhon Student Tracking System) will include all the following elements:

  1. Individual Success Plan signed off by mentor.
  2. Comprehensive clinical log of hours applied to doctoral-level learning outcomes.
  3. Learner evaluations (final).
  4. Practice mentor evaluations (final).
  5. Current and updated CV (update each course as necessary).
  6. Faculty approvals of the Individual Success Plan and documented practice immersion hours. (Learner is responsible for obtaining approvals.)
  7. Practice mentor’s approval of the Individual Success Plan and documented practice immersion hours. (Learner is responsible for obtaining approvals.)

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement

Learners will track their practice hours within the Typhon Tracking System throughout each course and via the “Practice Hours Completion Statement” assignment provided in this assignment.

Complete the following statement in a Word document, submit to the instructor, and complete the Typhon Tracking System entries appropriate for this course.

Create a Word document with the following text:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-810

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this course. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

DNP 810 Topic 8 Final Evaluation by Mentor

The mentor will perform a final clinical evaluation via the Typhon system. The mentor will receive an e-mail link at the beginning of Topic 6 to access the evaluation through Typhon. Students will access the completed mentor evaluations in Typhon under the tab for “EASI: Evaluation and Survey Instrument” and print the completed evaluation, sign it, and upload the signed evaluation into LoudCloud.

The course faculty will review the evaluation in LoudCloud and confirm in Typhon. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure that the mentor has completed the evaluation. If the mentor does not receive the evaluation via the e-mail address on file with GCU, the student should contact the course faculty immediately.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Mentor and Site Evaluation

Students may evaluate both their mentor and the site in which they conducted their practice immersion experience. All students must pull any completed evaluation from Typhon and submit to the classroom.

Students should provide screenshots of evaluation or copy/paste the evaluation from Typhon in the drop box in LoudCloud.