Discussion: Nursing-Roles Graphic Organizer
Discussion: Nursing-Roles Graphic Organizer
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Discussion: Nursing-Roles Graphic Organizer
Discussion: Nursing-Roles Graphic Organizer
Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template NUR 513 Week 2
Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template – Advanced registered nurses work in highly collaborative environments and must collaborate with interdisciplinary teams in order to provide excellent patient care. Besides knowing the role and scope of one’s own practice, it is essential to understand the role and scope of other nurse specialties to ensure effective collaboration among nurses, the organization, and other professionals with whom advanced registered nurses regularly interact.
Use the “Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template” to differentiate how advanced registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate with different areas of nursing practice. Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader; family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner; graduate nurse with an emphasis/specialty in public health, health care administration, business, or informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.
Week 1 Announcement
Hi everyone,
This week we are going to dive right into NUR-513. This first week, we discuss the history of advanced registered nursing (ARN) scope and how it has evolved in its scope and expectations. We will also be researching what the National Academy of Medicine (previously called the Institute of Medicine) recommends for nursing education and how the ARN can impact the health system. You will be completing two discussion questions and responding to your peers’ discussion questions. Finally, your Topic 1 assignment is to complete an online learning environment scavenger hunt. This scavenger hunt can be critical to your success at GCU, so please take the time to read and complete this well.
I look forward to rich discussions with all of you.
Requirements for this week:
1. Topic 1 DQ 1 by 8/6/22 at 11:59 pm
2. Topic 1 DQ 2 by 8/8/22 at 11:59 pm
3. Participation – respond to your peer’s post at least 3 different days this week
4. Assignment – “Navigating the Online Environment Scavenger Hunt”. This is due by 8/10/22 and is worth 50 points.
For full Discussion Question (DQ) points Topics 1-3, you are required to:
- Post your response of at least 150 words.
- Reference at least one source within five years for one of your DQs using APA format.
- When referencing, cite the reference inside your DQ and at the end to support your statements.
For full Participation points, you are required to:
- Post a response to your peers of at least 100 words on 3 different days during the week. Notice this doesn’t just say 3 responses; it must be 3 different days. This is a GCU requirement.
- I mark your response as either “substantial or not substantial” as I read them; watch for those markings throughout the week. If one of your responses was marked as “not substantial,” you will know to add another to receive full participation points that week. However, if you have waited until the last three days to reply to their responses, you will not be able to add another response to receive full participation credit. So I encourage you to respond early in the week and watch for those “substantial” or nonsubstantial” response markings.
As always please reach out if you have questions. However, let’s do this!!!!
Make sure to compare the following areas of practice in your graphic organizer:
Ethics
Education
Leadership
Public Health
Health Care Administration
Informatics
Business/Finance
Specialty (e.g., Family, Acute Care)
Include any regulatory bodies or certification agencies that provide guidance or parameters on how these roles incorporate concepts into practice.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents
sing Roles Graphic Organizer
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00%
3
Satisfactory
88.00%
4
Good
92.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Criteria
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to ethics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education
A comparison of roles in relation to education is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to education is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to education is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to education is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to education is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to leadership is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to public health is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to informatics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to specialty is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %Required Sources
Sources are not included.
Number of required sources is only partially met.
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all
sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Discussion: Nursing-Roles Graphic Organizer
Discussion: Nursing-Roles Graphic Organizer
5.0 %Visual Appeal
There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.
Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and
legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability.
Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.
Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not
consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and
relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.
Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual
connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas,
and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and
consistently.
Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual
connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and
relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and
consistently.
5.0 %Presentation
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication
of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is
employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and
figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.