In a minimum of 350 words.
1. Discuss in detail why the choice of a Functional Behavioral Assessment approach that utilizes principles of Behavior Analysis should be considered superior to previous iterations of assessment for problem behaviors. In your discussion, be sure to include reference to at least two of the following “old school” methods of behavior assessment: the diagnostic model, topography based, case based, or team preference based approaches.
2. Discuss some specifics related to research, empirical background, and legal issues that would justify the choice of a Functional Behavioral Assessment as a primary method for behavior assessment. Include reference to at least two specific research or study examples from Chapter 2 to back up your response.
Include At least one reference from : Steege, M. W. (2009). Conducting School-Based Functional Behavioral Assessments, Second Edition, 2nd Edition.
Taken together, the results of this study provide support for the idea that women do engage in intrasexual competition through the use of indirect aggression.
We thank Heather Brittain, Eric Duku, Lisa Elliot, Amanda Krygsman and Jessie Miller for their help with this research. We also thank Charles Cunningham, Wendy Troop-Gordon, Daniel Quigley, Steven Arnocky, Khrista Boylan, and Louis Schmidt for their helpful comments regarding this manuscript. Funding support came from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chairs program and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (awarded to Tracy Vaillancourt).
Abbey A, Cozzarelli C, McLaughlin K, Harnish J. 1987. The effect
of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual
intent: Do women evaluate these cues differently. J Appl Soc
Psychol 17:108–126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00304.x.
Archer J. 2009. Does sexual selection explain human sex differences
in aggression? Behav Brain Sci 32:249–311. DOI: 10.1017/
Arnocky S, Sunderani S, Miller JL, Vaillancourt T. (2011). Jealousy
mediates the relationship between attractiveness and females’
indirect aggression. Personal Relationships.
Barber N. 1995. The evolutionary psychology of physical attractive-
ness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethol Sociobiol
16:395–424. DOI: 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2.
Baumeister RF, Twenge JM. 2002. Cultural suppression of female
sexuality. Rev Gen Psychol 6:166–203. DOI: 10.1037//1089-
Benenson JF. 2009. Dominating versus eliminating the competition:
Sex differences in human intrasexual competition. Behav Brain
Sci 32:268–269. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999046X.
Benenson JF, Markovits H, Thompson ME, Wrangham RW. 2011.
Under threat of social exclusion, females exclude more than
males. Psychol Sci 22:538–544. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611402511.
Bjorkqvist K. 1994. Sex differences in physical, verbal and indirect
aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles 30:177–188.
Bleske AL, Shackelford TK. 2001. Poaching, promiscuity, and
deceit: Combating mating rivalry in same- sex friendships.
Personal Relationships 8:407–424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-
Buss DM. 1988. The evolution of human intrasexual competition: