Assignment: The Impact of Nursing Informatics NURS 6051
Assignment: The Impact of Nursing Informatics NURS 6051
Assignment The Impact of Nursing Informatics NURS 6051
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment The Impact of Nursing Informatics NURS 6051
The American Nurses Association (ANA) defines nursing informatics as a nursing specialty that consolidates nursing science with multiple data and analytical sciences. Informatics facilitates the process of identifying, defining, managing, and conveying information and knowledge in nursing practice (Kassam, Nagle & Strudwick, 2017). Nursing informatics work with a diverse group of professionals across the care continuum to bridge the gap between healthcare’s clinical and technical aspects. This paper will discuss a nursing informatics project that I advocate to improve patient outcomes and patient-care efficiency in my organization and how the project will achieve these goals.
The Proposed Project
My proposed nursing informatics project for the organization is developing a patient portal. A patient portal is a secure online website that offers patients convenient access to their health information using an Internet connection. A patient is provided a secure username and password to access the portal. Developing a patient portal improves patient care efficiencies as patients can easily access their medical information including, Medical history, clinical summaries, medication lists, diagnostic results, and prescription renewals (Sieck, Hefner & McAlearney, 2018). Besides, the patient portal features allow patients to pay their medical bills online, update demographic information, and make appointment requests and reminders. The portal also has secure messaging that is HIPAA-compliant and supports communication between patients and their primary care providers (PCPs) (Sieck et al., 2018). This can significantly ease patient care as patients can consult their PCP from home and save them the frequent visits to the hospital. Furthermore, the portal has a feature of patient educational materials, which allow patients to view health education materials. The feature can help increase health promotion practices among patients and improve health outcomes.
The Stakeholders Impacted By This Project
The patient portal project will impact internal stakeholders such as healthcare providers and external stakeholders such as patients and insurance providers. Healthcare providers, including nurses, physicians, and nurse practitioners, will be positively impacted by the patient portal, which improves the efficiency of patient care and streamlining workflow. According to Zhong et al. (2018), implementing a patient portal in healthcare organizations increases health providers’ efficiency by facilitating effective communication between the PCP and patients. Patients can also register themselves on the portal by entering their details electronically, which eliminates formation and reduces the errors that arise when handling a patient’s medical history manually (Dendere et al., 2019). Additionally, the portal streamlines providers’ workflow through online appointment scheduling and secure messaging, which patients can use for urgent consultations rather than visiting the physician physically.
The patient portal will significantly impact patients since the primary goal is to improve their care and health outcomes. A study by Sorondo et al. (2016) found that having access to patient portals can increase access to health providers and data, contributing to improvements in patients’ functional status and reducing healthcare costs. Patients with chronic illnesses, including geriatrics and their caregivers, may benefit more from using the portal technology than others since they are the highest healthcare consumers. Sorondo et al. (2016) argue that patient portals can facilitate care coordination programs to enhance patients’ self-management and care. Insurers will also be positively impacted since the portal allows patients to pay for the services they have utilized through a secured online platform. Patients can also change their insurance details and access their billing information seamlessly.
Patient Outcomes or Patient-Care Efficiencies This Project Is Aimed At Improving
The patient portal project aims to improve health outcomes and care efficiency for patients with chronic illnesses who are being followed for a long time. Integrating healthcare information technology in care coordination, according to Sorondo et al. (2016), can improve health care by increasing patients’ self-efficacy in managing their disease, improving health outcomes, reducing unnecessary health care visits, and reducing administrative costs and time for health providers. The project also aims to improve care coordination for chronic illness patients on coordinated care. Informatics can improve outcomes for chronic condition patients by increasing access to primary care and care coordination provided through patient portals, as well as serve as a sustainable resource for care coordination (Dendere et al., 2019). By exchanging information between health providers, patients, and caregivers, the project will improve care coordination. Furthermore, patient portals include screening and decision tools that can aid in improving care coordination.
Assignment: The Impact of Nursing Informatics on Patient Outcomes and Patient Care Efficiencies
In the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined?
Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring
patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.
To Prepare:
Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.
Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)
In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:
Describe the project you propose.
Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
By Day 7 of Week 4
Submit your completed Project Proposal.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 4 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 4 Assignment
Next Module
To go to the next module:
Module 3
Module 3: Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) (Week 5)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze benefits, challenges, and risks of using big data in clinical systems
Recommend strategies to mitigate challenges and risks of using big data in clinical systems
Due By
Assignment
Week 5, Days 1–2
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 5, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion post.
Week 5, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Week 5, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 5, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 22, “Data Mining as a Research Tool” (pp. 477-493)
Chapter 24, “Bioinformatics, Biomedical Informatics, and Computational Biology” (pp. 537-551)
Glassman, K. S. (2017). Using data in nursing practice. American Nurse Today, 12(11), 45–47. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ant11-Data-1030.pdf
Thew, J. (2016, April 19). Big data means big potential, challenges for nurse execs. Retrieved from https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/big-data-means-big-potential-challenges-nurse-execs
Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(1), 3–13.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Executive Producer). (2012). Data, information, knowledge and wisdom continuum [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6051/03/mm/continuum/index.html
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health Informatics and Population Health: Analyzing Data for Clinical Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Vinay Shanthagiri. (2014). Big Data in Health Informatics [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W6zGmH_pOw
Name: NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following: · Describe the project you propose. · Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project. · Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving, and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. · Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why. · Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team. | Points Range: 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed. The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur. The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why. The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team. Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources. | Points Range: 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) The response describes the project proposed. The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed. The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur. The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why. The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team. Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources. | Points Range: 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) The response describing the project proposed is vague or inaccurate. The response identifying the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed is vague or inaccurate. The response explaining the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation of how this improvement would occur, is vague or inaccurate, or includes little to no supporting evidence. The response identifying the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why is vague or inaccurate. The response identifying the project team (by roles) and an explanation of how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team is vague or inaccurate. Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 59 (59%) The response describing the project proposed is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response identifying the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response explaining the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation of how this improvement would occur, is vague and inaccurate, includes no supporting evidence, or is missing. The response identifying the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response identifying the project team (by roles) and an explanation of how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Includes: 1 or fewer resources. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|